Hydrogen gas emission spectrum

AI Thread Summary
When a hydrogen spectrum tube filled with H2 gas is energized, it primarily emits the atomic spectrum of hydrogen rather than the molecular spectrum of H2 due to the ionization process that breaks the H2 molecules apart. The resulting atomic hydrogen recombines, producing the visible spectrum defined by the Rydberg formula. The molecular hydrogen spectrum is less visible and typically not covered in basic physics textbooks, which focus on the more prominent atomic lines. The absorption spectrum of H2 gas shows atomic hydrogen lines because the energy levels of the electrons in H2 are influenced by the presence of both atomic and molecular states. This phenomenon highlights the complexity of molecular interactions and the limitations of standard spectroscopic observations.
papernuke
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If a hydrogen spectrum tube is filled with H2 gas and powered on, why do online sources show the tube emitting the spectrum of atomic single H hydrogen (the spectrum defined by the Rydberg formula)? Why not the H2 spectrum?

For example, here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because those are the one's you can see.

When you switch the tube on, the molecules break up when the hydrogen ionizes. You get atomic spectra when protons and electrons recombine.

Molecular Hydrogen spectra:
http://kicp.uchicago.edu/~odom/molecule_database/H2/molecular%20hydrogen%20spectrum%20tabulation.pdf

How a gas discharge tube works:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas-discharge_lamp
 
Simon Bridge said:
Because those are the one's you can see.

When you switch the tube on, the molecules break up when the hydrogen ionizes. You get atomic spectra when protons and electrons recombine.

Molecular Hydrogen spectra:
http://kicp.uchicago.edu/~odom/molecule_database/H2/molecular%20hydrogen%20spectrum%20tabulation.pdf

How a gas discharge tube works:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas-discharge_lamp

This may not be a satisfactory answer that properly explains the fact that emission and absorption spectra are the same. There is no ionisation in the process of absorption with low levels of power.
 
Yah - you want to provide the rest?
I think it is a good question.

Why does absorption spectra show atomic H lines in H2 gas?

The H2 molecular spectra is not visible like the famous Balmer lines.
Presumably there is also atomic H mixed in with the gas anyway.

This is certainly something not covered in textbooks for basic physics courses.
(Arn't there usually fewer lines in the absorbtion spectrum?)
 
Simon Bridge said:
Yah - you want to provide the rest?
I think it is a good question.

Why does absorption spectra show atomic H lines in H2 gas?

The H2 molecular spectra is not visible like the famous Balmer lines.
Presumably there is also atomic H mixed in with the gas anyway.

This is certainly something not covered in textbooks for basic physics courses.
(Arn't there usually fewer lines in the absorbtion spectrum?)

I'll pass :wink:.

I guess the main reason is that the 'other' half of the molecule must have only a small effect on the energy level of each of the electrons. Strange, as with covalent bonding, we regard the electrons as being 'shared'. Would we really expect a high proportion of atomic H in H gas?
Too hard for me guv - I'm an Electronic Engineer when asked questions of this depth. I tend to be a Physicist when asked Elecronics questions . . . . .

That would be reasonable because only one frequency will be absorbed per atom / molecule for each interaction - electrons would be very unlikely to be 'pumped up' in two stages to a higher level, whereas an incident electron could produce any energy level and produce two or more photons on the way down.
 
I was under the impression that by the time plasma had formed, nearly all of the H-H bonds would have been broken already because of its low bond energy (only like 4.5eV).
The first excitation of atomic H takes 10.2eV (n=1 to 2)

Is that right or wrong?
 
papernuke said:
I was under the impression that by the time plasma had formed, nearly all of the H-H bonds would have been broken already because of its low bond energy (only like 4.5eV).
The first excitation of atomic H takes 10.2eV (n=1 to 2)

Is that right or wrong?

I can't disagree with that but how does that account for the absorption spectrum being similar to the atomic emission spectrum?
 
sophiecentaur said:
I can't disagree with that but how does that account for the absorption spectrum being similar to the atomic emission spectrum?

Wait, the absorption spectrum of what is similar to the H atomic emission spectrum?
 
The molecular electron bound-state energy levels are linear combinations of atomic levels.

You'd expect that the electrons in a H2 molecule would spend most of their time between the two nuclei but when you solve the schodinger equ for it, you get a state with a big hump near one or the other and the time evolution sloshes back and forth.

Of course, you also get vibrational and rotational modes to a diatomic molecule.

Back to college :) - this is Dr Sadoway(?) lecture on covalent bonding.
http://videolectures.net/mit3091f04_sadoway_lec10/
... 1st 5mins is all about the test.
... 20mins in: this is an awesome lecture! I love the way he draws many connections with other ideas.
... 30mins - H2 energy level diagram.

Of the top of my head ... possibilities:
* hydrogen gas contains a mixture of H and H2
* the absorption process measures the atomic state of the electron out of the superposition
* the observed absorbtion spectra of hydrogen gas is actually very dissimilar to the emmission spectra of the same gas in a discharge tube.
* the spectra we observe is only approximately the atomic H spectra
* something else

OP refers to discharge tube though. And it is quite reasonable to assert that the discharge emmission spectra is from atomic hydrogen recombining from electrons and protons. Presumably there are molecular lines also present. The reason textbooks don't normally mess about with them is because they are hard to see.

All this suggests to me:
The molecular spectra is like the atomic one - but slightly doubled.
The actual lines you see are split very slightly into two lines due to the superposition involved in becoming a molecule.
We see only a single line on our spectrograph because the machine available to students is not precise enough. The width of the line depends on the width of the slit - if the slit is wide enough to see the image with the naked eye, two lines close together will just overlap and look like one line corresponding to the atomic transition.
These are further split for the rotational and vibrational modes.

This is taking me back quite a way :)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
papernuke said:
I was under the impression that by the time plasma had formed, nearly all of the H-H bonds would have been broken already because of its low bond energy (only like 4.5eV).
You are OP. Since that was your impression - didnt you already know the answer to the question you posed in post #1?

Sophiecentaur and I are off on a tangent :)
 
  • #11
Ahah: found it ...
1-s2.0-S0022407310004012-gr1.jpg

... the H2 energy level structure.

from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.10.015 Modeling of hydrogen ground state rotational and vibrational temperatures in kinetic plasmas; Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer Volume 112, Issue 5, March 2011, Pages 800–819
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
papernuke said:
Wait, the absorption spectrum of what is similar to the H atomic emission spectrum?

Afaik, the absorption spectrum of Hydrogen gas (Isn't that all molecular?) has lines which correspond to the emission spectrum from an H discharge tube.
I suppose the explanation based on "line broadening or splitting" is the best one.
 
  • #13
Who else can we ask?
 
Back
Top