Hydrogen to Helium: A Physical Science Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Softballokie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium Hydrogen
Softballokie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am a freshman and in physical science but we have not yet come to fusion or anything like that. One day I just started to think.. what if you took an ordinary hydrogen atom (not an isotope.) and added 1 proton, 1 electron, and 2 neutrons in whatever way you could. Would you get helium, or just a very strange hydrogen atom, or what?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you get helium, it's quite easy to do in large quantities if you have the correct equipement ( a star)
 
mgb_phys said:
Yes you get helium, it's quite easy to do in large quantities if you have the correct equipement ( a star)

Thats kind of cool.. would you happen to know how? and if so would you care to try to explain it to me?
 
Softballokie said:
I am a freshman and in physical science but we have not yet come to fusion or anything like that. One day I just started to think.. what if you took an ordinary hydrogen atom (not an isotope.) and added 1 proton, 1 electron, and 2 neutrons in whatever way you could. Would you get helium, or just a very strange hydrogen atom, or what?
The isotopes of hydrogen are protium (the atom is comprised of one electron orbiting a single proton), deuterium (one electron orbiting a nucleus composed of one proton and one neutron), and tritium (one electron orbiting a nucleus composed of one proton and two neutrons). In all three isotopes, the single proton provides the positive charge which is equal in magnitude but opposite of the electron.

The helium nucleus contains two protons. He-3 has a nucleus containing 2p+n, while the very common, He-4 had a nucleus (2p, 2n).

Adding p + p + 2n into one nucleus will give (2p,2n) = α, which is the nucleus of He-4.


Stars use the proton-proton cycle with interim steps to produce He-4, and there is a second cycle (CNO) in which protons are fused into the nuclei, the last one of which experiences a (p,α) reaction.

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/ppchain.html
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/cno.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/procyc.html
 
Last edited:
what if you took an ordinary hydrogen atom (not an isotope.) and added 1 proton, 1 electron, and 2 neutrons in whatever way you could

Protons by themselves aren't going to stick together, the system of two protons and no neutrons is not stable (don't ask me why).

You can add a neutron to each proton and make two deuterium atoms. Those are stable. You should be able simply to expose a hydrogen tank to neutron radiation to produce deuterium. I'm not sure how big the cross section is. In practice it's much easier to electrolyze ordinary water and separate deuterium from protium. There's always a measurable amount of deuterium in the water.

If you then take a quantity of deuterium and heat it to a very high temperature, deuterium nuclei will start smashing into each other and occasionally fuse together into helium. They are positively charged and electrostatic force will work to keep them apart. You need high temperature (i.e. high velocities of individual molecules) to bring them together close enough for d+d -> He reaction to go through. You don't start seeing significant conversion rates till you heat plasma to millions of degrees.

Then you cool the resulting mix (plasma consists of ionized nuclei and free electrons), electrons will naturally form orbits and create atoms.
 
Last edited:
The details depend on the exact temperature and pressure of your particular star. The important point is that all electorns, protons, nuetrons are the same and all heavier atoms are built up from hydrogen by similair processes in stars.

(ok - except some He3 that was formed in the big bang)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top