Hydrostatic Pressure: Liquids or Air?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that hydrostatic pressure applies to both liquids and gases, using the equation p = p0 + (rho)gh. While this equation effectively calculates pressure in incompressible fluids like water, it becomes less accurate for gases such as air due to density changes with elevation. Participants confirm that pressure decreases with height in the atmosphere, similar to how it increases with depth in oceans. An experiment mentioned reveals unexpected pressure readings in a water-filled container, prompting questions about the application of the hydrostatic pressure equation. Understanding the behavior of pressure in different fluids is crucial for accurate measurements and interpretations.
MyNewPony
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Is the equation for hydrostatic pressure limited to liquids? Or can it be used for air pressure as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The concept of 'hydrostatic pressure' applies to fluids, either liquid or gas. Remember the pressure of the atmosphere decreases with increasing elevation, or increases with decreasing elevation, just as pressure in the oceans increases with depth.

Please provide the equation to which one is referring.
 
Astronuc said:
The concept of 'hydrostatic pressure' applies to fluids, either liquid or gas. Remember the pressure of the atmosphere decreases with increasing elevation, or increases with decreasing elevation, just as pressure in the oceans increases with depth.

Please provide the equation to which one is referring.

Sorry, here it is:

p = p0 + (rho)gh

So, I can calculate both the pressure at the bottom of an ocean and the pressure at the top of a mountain using this method?
 
MyNewPony said:
Sorry, here it is:

p = p0 + (rho)gh

So, I can calculate both the pressure at the bottom of an ocean and the pressure at the top of a mountain using this method?

In the case where the density does not change with pressure. For water (an incompressible fluid), that's a good approximation. For air, that's a bad approximation.
 
MyNewPony said:
So, I can calculate both the pressure at the bottom of an ocean and the pressure at the top of a mountain using this method?

If you can get the exact density of the air on that heigth.
 
i just wondering..i conduct an experiment last week on pressure inside a container.note that the container is filled with water.i've found out that the pressure on the top of the container is greater compared to the lower of the container.it's suppose to be the opposite right based on P=pgh?why does the this occurred and please correct me if I'm wrong.i used the pressure gage to take the measurement.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top