Hydrostatics QA: Why Does Weight Increase When Adding Floating Material?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uspatange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrostatics
AI Thread Summary
When floating material is added to a bucket of water, the total weight of the system increases because the weight of the added object is transferred to the water, which exerts an equal buoyant force. This buoyant force does not negate the weight of the object; instead, it balances it, allowing the object to float. The scale measuring the bucket's weight reflects the combined weight of the bucket, water, and the added object. Even if the object sinks, its weight still contributes to the overall system weight. Thus, the increase in weight equals the weight of the object added, confirming that the system's weight changes with the addition of any material.
uspatange
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Somewhere I happen to read that when some floating material is dropped in bucket full of water such that the water does not spill out, the weight of the total system increases.

Well, but i don't understand why this should happen. the body floats as the buoyant force of water balances its weight. due to which the weight appears to be zero and the body floats. why should the weight of the whole system change in spite of addition of a zero?
how to foretell the change in weight that is going to happen in such a case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uspatange said:
Somewhere I happen to read that when some floating material is dropped in bucket full of water such that the water does not spill out, the weight of the total system increases.
I guess the bucket really wasn't full then. As far as the weight increasing, don't you think it had better? You have a bucket of whatever sitting on a scale. You drop something into it, so wouldn't you think the scale reading should increase?

Well, but i don't understand why this should happen. the body floats as the buoyant force of water balances its weight.
That's true. But the weight of the bucket + object increases. If the water pushes up on the object (the buoyant force), the object pushes down on the water with an equal force (Newton's 3rd law).
due to which the weight appears to be zero and the body floats. why should the weight of the whole system change in spite of addition of a zero?
You didn't add a zero, you added something with weight.
 
so you mean to say that the increase in weight is equal to the weight of the body dropped!
but doesn't the buyount force of the water affect it in any way?
So even if a non floating body is dropped in the water, the increase will still equal to the weight of the body?
 
uspatange said:
so you mean to say that the increase in weight is equal to the weight of the body dropped!
Of course!
but doesn't the buyount force of the water affect it in any way?
No. Imagine a totally different situation. You have a large block of wood sitting on the scale. You then place a smaller block on top of it. That small block is supported by an upward force from the large block. So, in a sense, it's floating on the large block, just like your dropped object was floating in the bucket of water. Of course the scale reads the total weight of both blocks.

Let's think of it in terms of forces acting on the large block. Before the small block is added, the forces acting on it are: its weight down and the normal force of the scale up. They add to zero, of course, so the scale just reads the weight of the large block. When you add the small block it exerts a second normal force on the large block equal to its weight. So now the forces acting on the large block are: normal force from small block, weight of large block, normal force from scale. Since everything is still in equilibrium, the scale now reads the total weight of both blocks.

Similarly with your object dropped into the bucket of water. The buoyant force is like the normal force between the two blocks. It adds to the force on the water, thus increasing the reading on the scale. (Another thing to realize is that the water level rises when you add the object, which increases the water pressure on the bottom of the pail. That's why I said that the bucket couldn't have been full if no water spilled out.)
So even if a non floating body is dropped in the water, the increase will still equal to the weight of the body?
Sure! In this case the buoyant force is not enough to support the object, so it just sinks to the bottom of the pail.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top