Hyperbolic geometry - relations between lines, curves, and hyperbolas

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between Euclidean and hyperbolic geometry, specifically how straight lines in Euclidean geometry relate to hyperbolas in hyperbolic geometry. The user inquires about the transformation of the line y=x in Cartesian coordinates to its hyperbolic counterpart. Experts clarify that a straight line in Euclidean geometry does not directly correspond to a hyperbola in hyperbolic geometry without specifying a model, such as the Klein model, the disc model, or the half-plane model. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these models to accurately represent hyperbolic expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic geometry models (Klein model, disc model, half-plane model)
  • Basic knowledge of calculus and rational expressions
  • Ability to interpret mathematical transformations between coordinate systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Klein model of hyperbolic geometry
  • Explore the disc model and its implications for hyperbolic lines
  • Learn about the half-plane model and its representation of hyperbolic geometry
  • Study the transformation of rational expressions in non-Euclidean coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students interested in the principles of hyperbolic geometry and its applications in various models.

Reuel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I studied calculus a while back but am far from a math god. I have been reading around online about hyperbolic geometry in my spare time and had a simple question about the topic.

If a straight line in Euclidean geometry is a hyperbola in the hyperbolic plane (do I have that right?) then what is the "transformation" from one to the other? For example, the line y=x in the Cartesian coordinate system would be what in the hyperbolic plane? That is, what hyperbola corresponds to y=x? Can the two be related?

The ultimate reason I am interested in knowing specifically how to go from one to the other is because I am curious as to how the hyperbolic rational expression of the form

f(x)=\frac{ax}{b+cx}​

would be expressed in non-Euclidean terms and what straight line in Euclidean geometry would lead to such a hyperbola in non-Euclidean geometry.

If any of that is nonsense, I apologize. I don't know much about the subject but am willing to learn.

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you are talking about. A "straight line in Euclidean geometry" isn't in the "hyperbolic plane" and so does not correspond to any thing there. You probably are talking about a "model" for the hyperbolic plane in the Euclidean plane such as the "Klein model", the "disc model" or the "half plane" model. But what a straight line represents in such a model depends upon which model you are referring to and, depending on the model, exactly which straight line. For example, any Euclidean straight line in the Klein model represents a hyperbolic straight line while only a straight line perpendicular to the boundary in the half plane model represents a straight line in hyperbolic geometry
 
Yeah. I'm sure my original post had plenty of flaws. I guess all I meant was, how would the function I mentioned be represented in non-Euclidean coordinates? You mentioned several "models" and I do not know enough about them to know which would be best suited for such. Hence seeking help from experts on such subjects.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K