Hypervolume of a Hypercube in Minkowski Space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MeJennifer
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the hypervolume of a hypercube in Minkowski space, exploring the mathematical definitions and implications of volume in this context. Participants examine the differences between Minkowski and Euclidean spaces, and raise questions about related geometric constructs such as the volume of a unit 4-sphere and 4-ball.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the 4-volume can be expressed as Duration * Length * Width * Height, but others question the validity of this expression in Minkowski space.
  • One participant suggests that the 4-volume is defined as the integral of a 4-form, leading to a discussion about the constant function in the context of Minkowski space.
  • There is mention of the Jacobian of Lorentz transformations and the concept of tensor density, with differing preferences for how to conceptualize volume forms.
  • Questions arise regarding the volume of a unit 4-sphere and the 4-volume of a unit 4-ball in Minkowski space, with participants expressing uncertainty about the terminology and the nature of these geometric objects.
  • One participant argues that the unit sphere does not have a finite volume, providing a mathematical expression for the integral involved.
  • Another participant discusses the area swept by a radius vector in 1+1 Minkowski space, noting that the area is infinite due to the nature of rapidity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and calculations of volume in Minkowski space, with no consensus reached on the validity of specific expressions or the nature of geometric constructs like the unit sphere.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the geometric implications of Minkowski space, including the dependence on definitions and the unresolved nature of certain mathematical steps.

MeJennifer
Messages
2,008
Reaction score
6
What is the hypervolume of a hypercube in a Minkowski space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
4-Volume = Duration * Length * Width * Height.
 
Hurkyl said:
4-Volume = Duration * Length * Width * Height.
I understand that that is the case for a Euclidean space.
But I fail to understand how you conclude that that also is the case for Minkowski space.
 
4-volume is the integral of a 4-form, so it must be given by

V = \iiiint f(t, x, y, z) \, dt \, dx \, dy \, dz

The symmetry of Minkowski space would force f(t, x, y, z) to be a constant function. All that's left is to determine the constant.

It would be reasonable enough to declare by fiat that the constant is 1, but a short google search turns up that there is a canonical choice of volume form, by setting f to be \sqrt{\left| \det g \right|}, where g is the metric tensor. Since we (presumably) chose (t, x, y, z)-coordinates to be orthonormal (a.k.a. an inertial coordinate chart), det g = -1, and f(t, x, y, z) = 1.(p.s. wow, LaTeX does have a quadruple integral symbol! I would have expected it to stop at 3)
 
Last edited:
If I remember correctly, \sqrt{\left| \det g \right|} is the jacobian of the lorentz transformations.
 
Technically speaking, I think the notion of a "tensor density" arises here.
But I think Hurkyl's response is correct.
 
How about the volume of a unit 4-sphere and the 4-volume of a unit 4-ball in Minkowski space?

These questions seem so basic, surely I am not the first person who asks such questions. :smile:

Anybody who can provide some numbers?
 
robphy said:
Technically speaking, I think the notion of a "tensor density" arises here.
But I think Hurkyl's response is correct.
To be honest, I really dislike the notion of a tensor density. I much prefer thinking about the differential 4-form
f(t, x, y, z) dt dx dy dz​
which is an honest-to-goodness tensor, rather than treating f(t, x, y, z) as a geometric entity in its own right.
MeJennifer said:
How about the volume of a unit 4-sphere and the 4-volume of a unit 4-ball in Minkowski space?

These questions seem so basic, surely I am not the first person who asks such questions. :smile:

Anybody who can provide some numbers?
Just to make sure we're on the same page -- the unit 4-sphere is not the set of all points a unit (Minkowski) distance away from the origin. That object is... well, in Minkowski 2-space it would be a hyperbola. I'm not sure what it's called in Minkowski 4-space.

The 4-volume of the unit ball is a straightforward quadruple integral. It's the same calculation as for the 4-sphere in Euclidean 4-space.

It's far too late for me to go searching for what the right notion of 3-volume would be.
 
Hurkyl said:
Just to make sure we're on the same page -- the unit 4-sphere is not the set of all points a unit (Minkowski) distance away from the origin. That object is... well, in Minkowski 2-space it would be a hyperbola. I'm not sure what it's called in Minkowski 4-space.
Well Hurkyl you seem to be much better in visualizing what a sphere is in Minkowski space, I already have enough trouble visualizing Euclidean 4-space let alone being able to visualize a sphere in Minkowski space, but whatever you want to call it, that is what I am asking for. :smile:

So all that I am asking for is the volume of the set of all points a unit distance away from the origin and the 4-volume of the set of all points from the origin up to a unit distance away from the origin.

So I am looking for two numbers, anybody who can tell me what they are? :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I don't think the unit sphere has a finite volume. With metric signature -+++, the integral is

\iiiint_{\mathcal{D}}dxdydzdt

where

\mathcal{D}=\{(x,y,z,t)\in\mathcal{R}^4:-t^2+x^2+y^2+z^2\leq 1\}=\{(x,y,z,t)\in\mathcal{R}^4:x^2+y^2+z^2\leq 1+t^2\}

So given a t, we integrate the volume of the 2-sphere of radius 1+t². And t goes from -infinity to +infinity.
 
  • #11
quasar987 said:
I don't think the unit sphere has a finite volume.
I think you are right.
 
  • #12
In 1+1 Minkowski space, you can calculate the area swept by a radius vector with tip on the unit hyperbola as A=\frac{1}{2}r^2\theta, where \theta is the intercepted Minkowski-angle (rapidity). Since the rapidity ranges from (-\infty, \infty), the area is infinite.

In n+1 Minkowski space, the analogous hypersurface is called the hyperboloid (asymptotic to the light cone).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K