B Hypothetical Gravity Question #2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores two hypothetical scenarios of jumping through a drilled hole from Earth's surface to its core and out the other side. In Scenario A, wind resistance may prevent reaching the surface, causing oscillation around the core until coming to rest. In Scenario B, a vacuum allows for continuous acceleration until reaching the surface, although gravitational imbalances and Coriolis effects could hinder this. The conversation also considers the impact of minor gravitational forces from Earth's topography and the need for propulsion to overcome these forces. Ultimately, the feasibility of such a transportation method raises intriguing questions about gravitational dynamics.
jayromano
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
A revolutionary mode of point-to-point transportation
Hello all,

My second hypothetical question for the day (and last).

Suppose you drilled a hole from the surface of the earth, through the Earth's core, and out the other side. The sides of the hole are reinforced preventing any of the hot stuff from escaping the Earth's core, in fact this hole is particularly impressive as it’s drilled perfectly straight through the center of the earth. You're feeling brave and decide to jump into the hole wearing your advanced suit which provides oxygen and protects you from heat and other nasty environmental variables which might kill you. It's a particularly good jump too, as you don't touch the sides at any point during your journey.

Scenario A (wind resistance): Do you accelerate to terminal velocity, pass the most central point of the Earth's core, and then gradually decelerate, failing to reach the surface on the other side because wind resistance has prevented you from reaching a velocity that will allow you to overcome the gravitational forces pulling you back toward the Earth's core once you pass the center? Would you then gradually accelerate back and forth with decreasing velocity until you came to rest at the central point of the Earth's core?

Scenario B (vacuum): Do you continue to accelerate until you pass the central point of the Earth's core, and then gradually decelerate until you reach the surface on the other side of the earth, at which point you stop falling very close to the surface on the other side as the gravitational forces are relatively balanced?

Thanks,
An insomniac who is kept awake by these thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As for scenario A, the pilot goes to and fro with diminution and stops at the center.
As for scenario B, the pilot stops at the other end of the tunnel and falls down back again.
 
  • Like
Likes jayromano and berkeman
Thanks for the reply anuttarasammyak,

To take this problem a little further, let’s add in the imbalance of the earth’s spherical mass (i.e. mountain ranges, below sea areas) and the gravitational forces of other planetary bodies. Now we have small forces influencing our human free-falling in the tunnel. My thoughts are that in Scenario B these forces would result in our human being pulled into the walls of the tunnel at certain points, which would result in deceleration and a failure to reach the surface on the other side?

Suppose we created a capsule which fit the dimensions of the tunnel minus a few millimetres on either side to eliminate friction (think of a pneumatic tube messaging system). This capsule travels through a vacuum (i.e. Scenario B). We let it free fall under its own weight. Would the minor forces pulling the capsule toward the walls have a braking effect, preventing the capsule from reaching the other side due velocity losses? For this system to hypothetically work, it would need some method of assistive light propulsion to overcome these minor forces?
 
jayromano said:
My thoughts are that in Scenario B these forces would result in our human being pulled into the walls of the tunnel at certain points, which would result in deceleration and a failure to reach the surface on the other side?
Unbalanced gravity from mountain ranges and such are minor annoyances. The bigger problem is Coriolis. You would be subject to enough normal force from the walls to cancel your 600 to 700 mile per hour motion on the surface of the rotating Earth to zero miles per hour by the time you hit the center (about 45 minutes later if I recall correctly).
 
  • Like
Likes jayromano
jayromano said:
Summary:: A revolutionary mode of point-to-point transportation
Scenario B (vacuum): Do you continue to accelerate until you pass the central point of the Earth's core, and then gradually decelerate until you reach the surface on the other side of the earth, at which point you stop falling very close to the surface on the other side as the gravitational forces are relatively balanced?

Thanks,
An insomniac who is kept awake by these thoughts.
You might what to check this out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_train
 
  • Like
Likes jayromano
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top