I am BSc in Physics graduates 3 years ago - lose my knowledge

AI Thread Summary
A BSc Physics graduate, now working in accounting, expresses regret over leaving the field of physics and desires to return to it by pursuing an MSc and eventually a PhD. The individual feels their mathematical and physics knowledge has deteriorated and seeks advice on how to regain their skills effectively. Others in the discussion share their experiences of transitioning back into physics, emphasizing the importance of revisiting foundational concepts and working through problems in textbooks. They suggest starting with well-regarded physics texts and developing a strong intuition for the subject, which is crucial for qualifying exams. The conversation also touches on the personal fulfillment derived from scientific work compared to accounting, highlighting a desire for meaningful contributions to society through research. Concerns are raised about the practicality of pursuing a career in physics, with some noting the need for specific certifications for roles like medical physicist. Overall, the discussion reflects a deep passion for science and the challenges of returning to an academic path after a career shift.
Canaan_C
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am BSc Physics graduates 3 years ago . After graduation I went into a totally different field "Accounting". (allow me to skip the reason here)

I am so regret now. My passion is still in science and I want to return to the world of physics and hope to be a researcher or any professions in physics one day. I am going to take a MSc in Physics and hope to get into Mphil and Phd later.

But now my problem is... My physics sense is gone, my mathematics sense is gone... the memories are so loose and rusty. I feel so sad that like I have betrayed my beloved one. I really really hope I could pick up my undergraduate knowledge once again to prepare for my MSc. but I don't know how to do and where to start would it be effective and efficient.

Back into the old days, I can handle 3 digits * 3 digits arithmetic mentally, but now I can't even handle 2 digits + 2 digts smoothly but with that Accountant Calculator. Oooops...

Please advice me how to do.

THANKS A LOT MY BROTHERS & SISTERS !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It all goes so quickly! I had the same idea as you, to switch from business back to physics - except I waited twenty years!

I started by re-learning calculus from my old textbook, re-read my old physics texts, worked problems - that took me through my freshman year of college! Then I got a copy of "Div, Grad, Curl and All That" by Schey and worked all of the problems. This took about eight weeks of nights and weekends.

Then I was admitted to a local college which offered physics in the late afternoon/early evening for commuting students, and took one course at a time for a four years. Eventually I completed their MS in physics, retaking a couple of senior level courses (QM, Optics, Analytical Mechanics) prior to taking the graduate versions.

Note that I was working full-time, and supporting a family; you may be able to work a bit faster!

Good luck!
 
OH what! 20 years!??

I am 25 now and i want to reboot my career. I aim to be doing radiation related research and be a medical physicists for my career.
 
I am thinking of start from Halliday or randall D knight first.
I got both. which one to start from would be better?
 
Not sure ... but I used Halliday & Resnick; any solid textbook would be OK to start with. The key is being able to work problems, and to develop a good intuition for what the physics is; this is what you will be tested on when you do your "qualifying exams". These usually cover your knowledge of undergraduate physics.
 
would anyone give me more advice pls?
 
Last edited:
atyy said:
I think most people would be happy to switch from a physics undergraduate degree to a career in accounting. I've seen advice that there are very few jobs in research physics that is is not wise to plan on it being a career. http://condensedconcepts.blogspot.com/2013/09/three-lies-that-ambitious.html

After these days working in accounting field, I realized that, the most important thing in life is not to get to be someone that other people think is hot (someone would think accountant is cool, CFO is hot, CEO! you're my alpha male! etc.). but is about to get to be someone you would proud of yourself and to do something that you would immerse yourself into, you would feel it with your heart and your would treat it like home and get comforts and joys from it.

What I always want to do is being a professional to help people, to improve their life or to do something that would make the world move forward (may be I am naive, but I do have this passion). But being an accountant, checking the invoices for clients everyday (probably check the same set of invoices again and again), doing the same accounting entries for a client every month, siting at the office doing the same actions like a robot everyday not mention to handle the temper of the boss, I don't feel I am contributing anything at all. No matter how hard and how heartily you prepare an account or conduct an audit for your client, your client can withdraw all his money and close up the company at any time he want. The works you have done for the company just gone forever and what left to you is the money in your pocket.

Doing science, at least I would consider myself I am contributing. Even a failure at a experiment is one step close to the truth. Nobody could take this away from you.

I know, doing scientific works is not a profitable or cool jobs to the eye of average people, but it also won't starve you to death. I would rather dreaming to be noble prize winner than dreaming to be the next bill gates.
 
Also switch from physics to accounting is easy, but the adverse is ten times harder. Why would there still be so many scientist out there if it would be happier to switch to a career in accounting? I's say, because this statement is not true at all.
 
  • #10
Canaan_C said:
OH what! 20 years!??

I am 25 now and i want to reboot my career. I aim to be doing radiation related research and be a medical physicists for my career.

Then why are you getting advanced education in physics instead of health physics or medical physics? You'll need to be certified to be a medical physicist though which makes a phd in physics seem like an around the way path.
 
  • #11
caldweab said:
Then why are you getting advanced education in physics instead of health physics or medical physics? You'll need to be certified to be a medical physicist though which makes a phd in physics seem like an around the way path.

Yah, to be a medical physicist at my place, at least I need to get a MSc in Physics first or MSc in Medical Physics (no such degree at my place but oversea).
 
  • #12
Canaan_C said:
After these days working in accounting field, I realized that, the most important thing in life is not to get to be someone that other people think is hot (someone would think accountant is cool, CFO is hot, CEO! you're my alpha male! etc.). but is about to get to be someone you would proud of yourself and to do something that you would immerse yourself into, you would feel it with your heart and your would treat it like home and get comforts and joys from it.

A very wise realization. As Picasso put it:

http://www.phinds.com/picasso/
 
  • #13
phinds said:
A very wise realization. As Picasso put it:

http://www.phinds.com/picasso/

While Picasso might have produced masterpieces with the blood of his fingers, most physics experiments cost lots of money, and require collaboration. Historically, the cheap and famous experiments in the 20th century were perhaps Raman's and Gabor's.

Incidentally, I do think accountants contribute positively to society. Enron, for example, was partly a case of accountancy gone wrong.
 
  • #14
atyy said:
While Picasso might have produced masterpieces with the blood of his fingers, most physics experiments cost lots of money, and require collaboration. Historically, the cheap and famous experiments in the 20th century were perhaps Raman's and Gabor's.

Incidentally, I do think accountants contribute positively to society. Enron, for example, was partly a case of accountancy gone wrong.

I didn't say anything against accountants or accounting industry, everyone in a society plays a part.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top