I am working out of Sakurai and he says the integral with respect to

  • Thread starter Thread starter Berko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Sakurai
Berko
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I am working out of Sakurai and he says the integral with respect to p` of exp(ip`(x`-x``)/h-bar) is 2-Pi-h-bar times the dirac delta function of (x`-x``). (Sorry, I am not sure how to make actual integrals).

I was wondering why this is true? For example, if x` = x``, isn't the integral infinity? And, if not, why is it well defined given the oscillations involved?

Thank you for your time.

P.S. This is page 54, equation 1.7.31 out of Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics, second edition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The explanation you look for can be found in any book on Fourier analysis and distribution theory.
 
Last edited:
Hi Berko! :smile:

Technically, the dirac delta function is not a function, it's a distribution (or "generalised function").

It is not intended to be on its own, it is always inside another integral.

ie, a distribution A(x) is only intended to be inside an ∫A(x)f(x) dx …

its "value" for any particular value of x, eg A(0), is not really relevant. :wink:

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_(mathematics)" )
 
Last edited by a moderator:


One way to think of it might also be: what is the Fourier transform of \delta(x-x')?
 


A way to think about this is to do

\int_{-A}^A e^{ikx} dk = [\frac{1}{ix}e^{ikx}]_{k=-A}^{k=A} = \frac{1}{ix}(e^{iAx} - e^{-iAx}) = 2 \frac{\sin{Ax}}{x}

Now let A go to infinity. You get a function that is highly oscillatory every except right at x=0. You can do the integral of the function over all x; the result is 2 pi. So if you integrate this function against another function f(x), the oscillations will make everything cancel out except right in the region x=0, and the result will be 2*pi*f(0). So this suggests that you identify

\lim_{A \to \infty} 2 \frac{\sin{Ax}}{x} = 2 \pi \delta (x)
 


@The_Duck: sometimes I wish there were "LIKE" buttons on here, i'd click it. Nice derivation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top