I do not understand why i keep getting these trig equations wrong =(

  • Thread starter Thread starter sportsstar469
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding solving trigonometric equations, specifically involving cosine and tangent functions. The user correctly identifies the reference triangle for cos(x) = -1/2 and finds solutions in quadrants 2 and 3, but struggles with discrepancies between their answers and the textbook's. They express frustration over understanding transformations and reflections of trig graphs, seeking tips for improvement. Clarifications are made about the domain of the inverse tangent function and the distinction between particular and general solutions in trigonometry. Overall, the user is grappling with foundational concepts in trigonometry and seeks guidance on accurately solving equations and graph transformations.
sportsstar469
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
cosx= -1/2 i realized my ref triangle is pie /6. i know that cosine is negative in quad 2 and 3. i labeled my axis (this helped me) with pie being 6 pie over 6, pie over 2 i put 3 pie over 6, 3pie over 2 i put as 9 pie over 6, and 2 pie i made 12 pie over 6.

ok since one solution is in quad 2(between 3 pie/6 and 6 pie/6) and ref angle is pie/6 i got 5pie/6

my other solution which is correct in the book is 4pie/3. so i got 4pie/3 and 5pie/6.

the book says 2pie/3 and 4 pie/3.

im just so frustrated, i thought i understood this stuff. its bad enough i can't understand, transformations, reflections, stretching, and compressing trig graphs, but now i can't do the equations either =(

those are my particulars not my general with periods./i then did tanx= -1 and i got 3pie/4 and 7pie/4 as my answers. or since you just need one i just got 3pie/4 + pie k/. the book says the answer is -pie over 4.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What angle gives cos x = 1/2? Is it pi/6?
 
sportsstar469 said:
those are my particulars not my general with periods./
?
sportsstar469 said:
i then did tanx= -1 and i got 3pie/4 and 7pie/4 as my answers. or since you just need one i just got 3pie/4 + pie k/. the book says the answer is -pie over 4.

The domain of the inverse tangent function (tan-1(x) or arctan(x)) is -\pi/2 < x < \pi/2, so that might be why your book gave an answer of \pi/4. The reference point for this angle is the same as the reference point for 7\pi/4.

BTW, "pie" is something to eat. The name of this Greek letter, \pi, is pi.
 
Last edited:
Tedjn said:
What angle gives cos x = 1/2? Is it pi/6?
yes, i used the special triangle that's what i was told in class...

edit ITS PI OVER 3! WOW I HATE MAKING STUPID MISTAKES!

ANYBODY HAVE ANY TIPS ON (sorry caps) transforming graphs of sine and cosine i am totally lost here ;))
Mark44 said:
?The domain of the inverse tangent function (tan-1(x) or arctan(x)) is -pi/2 < x < \pi/2, so that might be why your book gave an answer of \pi/4. The reference point for this angle is the same as the reference point for 7\pi/4.

BTW, "pie" is something to eat. The name of this Greek letter, \pi, is pi.

whyd you put questions under that part? their are general solutions and particular lol. the general is when you add the periods.

im not really sure what you were trying to say, but i think youre saying my second problem was ok?

i know the reference points are the same... when solving trig equations youre supposed to find the exact solutions.. do you remember how to do this
 
Last edited:
sportsstar469 said:
whyd you put questions under that part? their are general solutions and particular lol. the general is when you add the periods.
I still don't know what you're talking about when you say "add the periods."
sportsstar469 said:
im not really sure what you were trying to say, but i think youre saying my second problem was ok?
Maybe. Were you asked to find a solution in a certain interval? If you were asked to find a solution in the interval [-\pi/2, \pi/2], your answer of 7\pi/4 isn't in that interval. Keep in mind that the reference points are the same, but the angles aren't equal.
sportsstar469 said:
i know the reference points are the same... when solving trig equations youre supposed to find the exact solutions.. do you remember how to do this
Yes, I remember how to do this, but what's your point?
 
Mark44 said:
I still don't know what you're talking about when you say "add the periods."

Maybe. Were you asked to find a solution in a certain interval? If you were asked to find a solution in the interval [-\pi/2, \pi/2], your answer of 7\pi/4 isn't in that interval. Keep in mind that the reference points are the same, but the angles aren't equal.
Yes, I remember how to do this, but what's your point?

these are from what i know, just basic level 1 trig equations. m supposed toi find the particular solutions (the exact angles from the ref angles (nott he ref angles) and then by general solution i mean i take my exact angles and add the period to it.
if my particular solution was 5pie over 3 for a sin equation my general would be that angle plus two pi k.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top