I don't understand conservative systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Look below.

Homework Equations



So my book says that you have a conservative system when E'(t) = [(1/2)m(x'(t))2 + V(x(t))]'(t) = 0. It gives an example of V(x) = -(1/2)x2 + (1/4)x4, whence setting y = x' gives E = (1/2)y2 -(1/2)x2 + (1/4)x4. According to the book, E = constant. Not sure how they got this since E' ≠ 0 as far as I can tell.

The Attempt at a Solution




Me no understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found this document with the same example. As soon as my headache leaves, I read it.
 
The system obeys Newton's second law, F=ma. It then follows that your expression for E is constant for any V(x). You should be able to show that E' = (ma + dV/dx)v(t), where v(t) is the velocity. Since the force F is given by -dV/dx, the factor in the parentheses vanishes, so E'=0.

However, I'm guessing your book isn't really expecting you to show that E'=0. It's telling you because the system is conservative, E'=0 so that E is a constant.

In the xy-plane, the possible behavior of the system is represented by the family of curves that satisfy ##E = \frac{1}{2}my^2 - \frac{1}{2}x^2 + \frac{1}{4}x^4##, where each curve can be associated with a specific value of E.

Take the example of a free particle, where V(x)=0. Then you have ##y = \sqrt{2E/m} = \text{constant}##. The particle moves with constant velocity.
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top