I dont understand how antiderviative of 2 sin (2x) could be -cos(2x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mugzieee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sin
AI Thread Summary
The antiderivative of 2 sin(2x) is -cos(2x) because when differentiating -cos(2x), the chain rule introduces a factor of 2, resulting in 2 sin(2x). The constant 2 is accounted for in the differentiation process, effectively "disappearing" during integration. Similarly, for the antiderivative of 5e^(5t), the derivative of e^(5t) yields 5e^(5t), leading to the simplification of the antiderivative to e^(5t) after dividing by 5. It is essential to remember that the antiderivative is the inverse of the derivative, impacting constants and coefficients accordingly. Understanding these relationships clarifies the confusion surrounding antiderivatives.
mugzieee
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
i don't understand how the antiderviative of 2 sin (2x) could be -cos(2x), what happens to the 2?

also how can the antiderivative of 5e^(5t) be e^(5t)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mugzieee said:
i don't understand how the antiderviative of 2 sin (2x) could be -cos(2x), what happens to the 2?

also how can the antiderivative of 5e^(5t) be e^(5t)?

Well, what do you get when you take the derivative of -cos2x? You apply the chain rule or whatever rule it is and come up with 2sin2x. Just like the 2 "appears" when taking the derivative, it also "disappears" when you take the antiderivative.

As for the second one, Dx (e^x) = e^x, that's why the second one is true.

If in doubt concerning an antiderivative, just check by taking the derivative of the answer you found.
 


The derivative of 2 sin(2x) is -4cos(2x), so the antiderivative would be -2sin(2x). The 2 is still there, it just gets multiplied by the derivative of 2x which is 2. As for the antiderivative of 5e^(5t), the derivative of e^(5t) is 5e^(5t), so the antiderivative would be 5e^(5t)/5, which simplifies to just e^(5t). Remember, the antiderivative is the inverse operation of the derivative, so any constants or coefficients will also be affected by the inverse operation.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top