I have a non-homework question about the importance of the charge of an electron

  • Thread starter Thread starter vande060
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Electron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significance of the electron's charge, which is approximately 1.60217646 × 10-19 coulombs, and why all particles in the universe exhibit charges that are integer multiples of this value. Participants express curiosity about the implications of this phenomenon, questioning why the electron's charge is a fundamental unit and why protons, which are composed of quarks, also exhibit charges that align with this integer multiple concept. There is a consensus that the charge of particles must be related to the charge of electrons, as particles are formed from them, leading to the idea that the electron's charge might be a foundational aspect of particle physics. The conversation highlights the ongoing research at facilities like the LHC to explore these fundamental questions. Understanding the nature of charge and its origins remains a pivotal topic in modern physics.
vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
If I heard my physics professor correctly, he said that one of the largest standing problems in science is why particles in the universe always have a charge that is a multiple integer of the charge of an electron (1.60217646 × 10-19 coulombs). He went on to say that the LHC is looking for the answer right now, and if someone where to show this that they would be the most famous scientist. I wonder why this is important, and what is the implication? Like I said, this is not homework, just a curious question. I have a understanding of physics up to the second semester of freshmen college calc based physics.

He didnt say anything else about it; I honestly don't see how you can bring up something like that to a room full of scientists to be and then walk away without revisiting the topic! :)

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I'm not knowledgeable on any of this, but given you only get whole electrons wouldn't it make sense that particles have a charge that is a multiple of the charge of an electron if they contain electrons? Where would the extra charge come from?
 
jarednjames said:
Well I'm not knowledgeable on any of this, but given you only get whole electrons wouldn't it make sense that particles have a charge that is a multiple of the charge of an electron if they contain electrons? Where would the extra charge come from?

Makes sense, if everything is made of particles with a charge you have to have some multiple of that charge. he made it sound like a big question, maybe i misunderstood.
 
The way you charge something is to add / remove electrons (think static electricity buildups) so to me it makes sense that it would be a multiple of the electron charge value. Assuming the proton value rarely changes, the best way to gauge the amount of charge would be with the electron count.
 
I think it is more of a question as to why the electron charge is 1.60217646 × 10-19 coulombs and not why everything else is a multiple of this charge.

Even when you get down to it, why should a proton have the same charge (different sign) than an electron? Electrons are (believed to be) elementary particles. Protons (and neutrons) are made up of quarks which have charges that are either 1/3 or 2/3 of the charge on an electron. Free quarks don't exist in nature, but why doesn't the electron have the same magnitude of charge as a quark?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top