I have a question on a simple 555 buzzer circuit.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SupernerdSven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the setup and troubleshooting of a 555 timer circuit configured in astable mode to drive a transducer, specifically the Panasonic 24C411 piezo. Participants explore various aspects of the circuit design, including output current limitations, component choices, and testing methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant plans to use a 555 timer in astable mode to generate a square wave for a transducer, questioning the need for a current limiting resistor.
  • Another participant suggests that the piezo nature of the transducer may not require a limiting resistor, proposing experimentation with a 100-ohm resistor.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about current limitations and mentions the use of a potentiometer for gradual adjustments.
  • One participant reports unsuccessful attempts with both a 100-ohm resistor and an 8-ohm speaker, indicating a lack of oscillation and expressing a desire for an oscilloscope to diagnose the issue.
  • Suggestions include using an electrolytic capacitor to couple the speaker and testing the 555 circuit's oscillation by connecting a larger capacitor to observe LED blinking.
  • Another participant recommends checking the output voltage with a multimeter to verify oscillation, noting that a rudimentary multimeter may not detect low AC voltages.
  • A participant mentions concerns about the 555 timer possibly being damaged and discusses the functionality of an LM741 op-amp in their circuit.
  • One participant inquires about the silence produced by the coupling capacitor.
  • Another suggests using a DC meter for testing and emphasizes the importance of ensuring proper connections while encouraging persistence in troubleshooting.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the necessity of current limiting and the effectiveness of different components, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the underlying issue with the circuit.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations in their testing equipment, such as a rudimentary multimeter that cannot measure low AC voltages, and the potential for static damage to the 555 timer. There are also unresolved questions regarding the specific behavior of the circuit components.

SupernerdSven
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I plan to take a 555, wire it up into astable operation to make a square wave, and hook the output up to a transducer. It's Panasonic's 24C411, with a rated voltage of 15V peak-to-peak and a maximum current of 2mA. Apparently, the maximum output current of the 555 is 200mA, and a 9V can put out between 100mA and 200mA at the highest. I'd like to simply use a resistor, but would that just draw too much of the voltage?

On the other hand, perhaps it would be better to use a speaker. I just remembered that I have a small one lying around.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Panasonic 24C411 appears to be a piezo, which means it's mostly capacitive, so you probably don't need a limit resistor at all. But you could experiment to see how loud things get with, say, 100 ohms...
 
Thank you! That's what I thought at first, but then the mention of a current limit made me unsure. I've got a potentiometer, so I can try it gradually, too.
 
I tried it with a 100 ohm resistor and then with nothing, to no avail either time. Then I tried with an 8 ohm speaker, and it made a small pip upon being connected and then again upon being disconnected, as if it were high all the time. I wish I had an oscilloscope so I could tell if that's actually the case. For the time being, what do you think?
 
Try coupling to the speaker via an electrolytic capacitor, say 100uF, with its + terminal going to the 555's output. A 25V or higher rating will be fine.

To test whether the 555 circuit is actually oscillating, you could temporarily connect a larger capacitor across its timing capacitor, making the period quite long, then power a LED from the output (in series with a 4.7k resistor) to see whether the LED blinks.
 
Also as a 555 no-oscillate test you could check the output voltage with both DC and AC settings on a multimeter to see if there is any difference. Zero AC volts and your one-click speaker would indicated that the chip is not oscillating...
 
I have a very rudimentary multimeter; it won't check AC voltages this low. I considered that the 555 might be busted by static, so I tried with a Wein bridge oscillator - no good there either. However, I know for a fact that the LM741 I'm using is working. That's only supposed to put out 25 mA - maybe that's not enough.

I like NascentOxygen's idea with the LED - unfortunately, I'm just starting with electronics and actually don't have any. I'll keep trying, but I really don't know what's wrong...
 
So the coupling capacitor gave silence?
 
You can use your DC meter instead of an LED for the NOx long-period test. You can also use the DC setting to "look at" a higher frequency AC, especially one that swings between 0 and +V, because it will try to average the signal and thus show a lower than +V reading -- if there is any oscillator activity.

555's are not very static sensitive, although you may destroy them by reversing the supply lines. I don't remember offhand if I've ever outright killed any while putzing around with them. I would double check that you have everything connected like this (where you can use your meter -- to + or - -- instead of the LED):
http://static.electro-tech-online.com/imgcache/8016-555schematic.gif

And I would investigate getting a good multi-meter, even a $10 one should have some low voltage AC facility...

Also, don't give up hope. Things will (suddenly) start to work (for no apparent reason)!
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K