I in assigning R/S stereochemistyr

  • Thread starter Thread starter future_vet
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Assigning R/S stereochemistry can be challenging, especially when visualizing molecular structures. The discussion highlights difficulties in rotating molecules to determine stereochemistry, particularly when two atoms are positioned in the front and two in the back. A method mentioned involves fixing one atom and rotating the others to simplify the process. The user seeks clarity on how to approach molecules where none are in the plane of the paper, indicating a need for effective visualization techniques. Resources like the provided links can assist in understanding stereochemical assignments better.
future_vet
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
(There is no problem statement etc.)

I am having a very hard time figuring out how to assign R/S stereochemistry on certain compounds. I can't rotate molecules in my head without making mistakes, and so I rotate them on paper.

Let's take this example:
http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/CHEM331/331FinalKeyF03.pdf
Go to page 6 please, we have to label compounds.

When a molecule has 2 atoms in the plane, + 1 in the front and 1 in the back, I can rotate them. I keep one atom fixed, usually #2 (4 being the smaller, 1 the largest), and rotate the other 3.

However, and this is where I need help, I don't know what to do when I have molecules such as the ones on the left, where 2 are in the back and 2 in the front, and none in the plane of the paper/screen.

How can I rotate those on paper in order to assign R/S stereochemistry?

Thank you for any help you can give me!

~J.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I found this:
http://chem.pdx.edu/~wamserc/C334F99/4notes.htm

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top