I just dont get the idea on how to do this [projectile motion]

AI Thread Summary
To analyze projectile motion when projected at an angle above a height, it's effective to treat the motion as two independent components: vertical and horizontal. The horizontal motion can be described as constant speed, using the equation x = vt, while the vertical motion behaves like an object thrown straight up, with initial speed derived from the angle theta. The connection between the two components is the shared time variable. By applying F=ma separately to each component, one can calculate maximum height and range. This method simplifies the analysis of projectile motion significantly.
suryanarayan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
i don't know how this works...when a body is projected at an angle "theta" with the horizontal above a height 'h'...what is its maximum height and maximum range?should i just treat it as two separate motions or is there another way to do it...i can solve if it is just a parabolic projection from the ground or if it is horizontal projection from an height(parallel to the horizontal)

please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The preferred technique is to break the motion into two independent components, vertical and horizontal. You can write F=ma for the two componenents separately, and the only thing that connects them is they share the same "t" (time). Often, the horizontal (x) component is simply motion at a constant speed, x=vt. The vertical (y) component is the same as if you throw a particle straight up with some initial speed u. Then note that v and u are the components of the initial velocity, using trigonometry on the angle theta.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top