I still need someone smart to explain 2 me momentum and Impulse throughly .

AI Thread Summary
Momentum is calculated using the formula p = m*v, where the leopard's momentum is 400 kg*m/s at 10 m/s. Each bullet fired by the hunter has a momentum of 45 kg*m/s. When the hunter shoots, the bullet's momentum acts in the opposite direction, effectively reducing the leopard's momentum. To stop the leopard, the total momentum from the bullets must equal the leopard's initial momentum. The discussion emphasizes understanding momentum and impulse through the context of this physics problem.
devilz_krypt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I still need someone smart to explain 2 me momentum and Impulse throughly...

1. A hunter has rifle that can fire a.05 kg bullets with a speed of 900 m/s. A 40 kg leapord springs at him at 10 mm/s. How many bullets would the hunter need to stop the tiger dead in its tracks? How do you find the answer? Can someone please explain this problem step by step to me
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The leopard has momentum, p=m*v, so 40*10=400 [kg*m/s] (I'm assuming the leopard is going 10 m/s, not 10 millimeter per second, which would be awfull slow).

Everytime the hunter shoots a bullet, it's momentum is added to the leopard's. However, since p=m*v is actually a vector equation, we have to account for a minus sign since because the bullets are shot in the opposite direction in which the leopard is moving. So, effectively, each bullet takes some momentum from the leopard, subtracting it from the leopard's total momentum.

Now, each bullet has momentum p=m*v=0.05*900=45 [kg*m/s]. How many bullets should the hunter fire to reduce the leopard's momentum to zero?
 


yea that was a typo 10 m/s not 10 mm/s.
 


I'd just like to add that you can think of the bullet and the leopard as an inelastic collision.

By the way, this is kind of a gruesome physics question :biggrin:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top