Ideal Gas in Piston (Constant Pressure vs Rate of collision)

AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless piston containing ideal gas, heating the gas causes the piston to move outward until the temperature stabilizes, resulting in constant pressure. Despite the increase in the average speed of gas molecules, the rate of collision with the piston decreases, as maintaining constant pressure requires a reduction in collision frequency. A mathematical derivation shows that the collision rate is inversely proportional to the square root of temperature when pressure is constant. The relationship is expressed through the formula f = (1/4)0.921√(3p²/(mRT)), indicating that as temperature increases, the collision rate decreases. This analysis effectively links temperature changes to collision dynamics in the context of ideal gas behavior.
Stunner
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A syringe contains ideal gas. The piston is frictionless and no gas escapes. Once heated slowly, the piston moves outwards. The piston stops moving when the temperature is steady. The pressure of the gas after the piston stops moving remains the same (no change in pressure). What can we say about the rate of collision between the gas molecules and piston?
1) Ok we know that the average speed of the molecules increases (hence increased KE).
2) It is said that the rate of collision “decreases”.
Reason: KE increases. If frequency of collision remains the same (or increases), the pressure would increase. But pressure remains constant, so the frequency of collision has to be lower.

This is a very logical approach to answering the problem. But is there a mathematical derivation to show how this is so? The closest I can find is P=(Nmv^2)/(3V) where v is the average speed per molecule and V is the volume. N is the number of molecules and m is the mass.
Is there a formula showing how rate of collision is linked to an increased temperature (given increased volume and constant pressure).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Also let me know if there’s anyone I can ask. Thank you so much in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can show that the number, f, of collisions per unit wall area, per unit time is given by f\:=\:\frac{1}{4}\frac{N}{V}\overline{v}
in which \overline{v} is the mean speed of the molecules.

It can be shown from the Maxwell distribution of molecular speeds that \overline{v}=0.921v_{rms}.

So f\:=\:\frac{1}{4}0.921\frac{N}{V}v_{rms}.

But pV=\frac{1}{3}Nmv_{rms}^2

Eliminating v_{rms} we obtain
f\:=\:\frac{1}{4}0.921\sqrt{\frac{3Np}{mV}}
and, finally, eliminating V using pV = NkT

We have f\:=\:\frac{1}{4}0.921\sqrt{\frac{3p^2}{mRT}}

So we have established that for constant p, f is proportional to \frac{1}{\sqrt T}
 
Stunner: Is this what you wanted?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top