Mass of Oxygen Withdrawn from Tank at 28.0 atm

  • Thread starter Thread starter hot2moli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Oxygen Tank
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the mass of oxygen withdrawn from a tank as pressure decreases from 41.0 atm gauge pressure to 28.0 atm gauge pressure. Participants clarify that the volume of the tank is constant, allowing the use of the Ideal Gas Law, but emphasize the importance of using actual pressures instead of gauge pressures for accurate calculations. The actual pressures must be determined by adding atmospheric pressure to the gauge readings. Misunderstandings arise regarding the proportionality of gauge pressures versus actual pressures in the calculations. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using the actual pressures to find the number of moles and subsequently the mass of oxygen remaining in the tank.
hot2moli
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The pressure gauge on a tank registers the gauge pressure, which is the difference between the interior and exterior pressure. When the tank is full of oxygen (O2), it contains 15.0 kg of the gas at a gauge pressure of 41.0 atm. Determine the mass of oxygen that has been withdrawn from the tank when the pressure reading is 28.0 atm. Assume the temperature of the tank remains constant.

I though you could use the Ideal gas law, converting 15kg into moles, but would the volume be considered constant here? Because if not, then I do not see how you could apply it to PV= nRT.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume is the volume of the tank itself. So, yes. The volume is constant. What isn't constant here (other than the pressure of course) is the number of mols of oxygen.
 
Last edited:
so I did P/n = P2/n2
and I am not getting the right answer.
P= 41atm
n= (15000g)/(16g/mol)
P2= 28
and then I solve for n2 multiplying by 16g/mol to get mass of oxygen?

WHERE I HAVE I GONE WRONG? :( PLEASE HELP!
 
Remember that 41atm is the gauge pressure, not the actual pressure.
 
I'm sorry.. I still am not understanding...25atm wouldn't be the actual than either, but can't you make them proportional still because it's the same system?...and even if it's not the actual P, wouldn't you just add 1atm to it to account for air pressure?
 
hot2moli said:
I'm sorry.. I still am not understanding...25atm wouldn't be the actual than either, but can't you make them proportional still because it's the same system?...and even if it's not the actual P, wouldn't you just add 1atm to it to account for air pressure?

No, the proportionality will only hole for the actual pressures, since the addition of 1 atm to the numerator and denominator of P_1/P_2 will not give the same fraction. i.e.:

\frac{P_{gauge 1}}{P_{guage2}}=/=\frac{P_1}{P_2}

Work with the actual pressures.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top