Identify the value of δ( accur. to 2 dec. places) that corresponds to ε=0.01?

  • Thread starter Thread starter solve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the value of δ that corresponds to ε=0.01 for the limit lim x->-1 (x^2+3)=4. The key inequality derived is |(x^2+3)-4| < 0.01, which simplifies to |x-1||x+1| < 0.01. The solution involves assuming |x+1| < 1 to facilitate the manipulation of the inequality, leading to the conclusion that |x-1| can be replaced by a constant to maintain the validity of the inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit definitions in calculus
  • Familiarity with epsilon-delta proofs
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of inequalities
  • Knowledge of continuity and behavior of functions near specific points
NEXT STEPS
  • Study epsilon-delta definitions of limits in calculus
  • Practice solving limit problems using the epsilon-delta method
  • Explore continuity of functions and their implications on limits
  • Review algebraic techniques for manipulating inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and epsilon-delta proofs, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for their students.

solve
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Identify the value of δ( accur. to 2 dec. places) that corresponds to ε=0.01, given lim x->-1 (x^2+3)=4, according to the definition of limits.


Homework Equations



|f(x)- L| < ε

0<|x-a| < δ

The Attempt at a Solution



|(x^2+3)- 4| <0.01

|x^2-1| <0.01

|x-1||x+1| <0.01

This where I have no idea what to with |x-1|. Do I divide 0.01 by |x-1|? Any hints, please?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't want to divide by |x- 1|, you want to divide by a number which means that you need to replace |x- 1| by a number that keeps the inequality true.

You only need to prove this for x "close" to -1 so start by assuming that |x-(-1)|= |x+ 1|< 1 (1 is chosen just as a convenient value- any positive number would work). That is, that -1< x+1< 1. Subtracting 2 from each part, -3< x- 1< -1 which is the same as saying that |x- 1|> 1. We want ">" here because now we can say that if we replace |x- 1| by 1 in |x- 1||x+ 1| we have replace it by something larger: |x-1||x+1|< |x+ 1|. If we take |x+1|< .001 then it is certainly true that |x-1||x+1|< |x+1|< .001.
 
Hi, HallsOfIvy. I appreciate your answer. Just never got around to answering to this thread. Wanted to acknowledge I read your answer and probably will have some questions once I finally have time to look at it a bit closer. Thank You, HallsOfIvy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K