Identifying Action Reaction Forces: A Newton's Third Law Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying action-reaction force pairs based on Newton's Third Law. Participants suggest pairs such as the man and monkey, monkey and scale, and scale and tree, but emphasize the importance of direct contact in these interactions. It is clarified that forces must be between objects that are in direct contact, meaning the man and tree do not exert forces on each other directly. The concept of tension is also mentioned as relevant to understanding these interactions. Ultimately, the conversation stresses the need to refine the identified pairs to ensure they adhere to the principles of Newton's Third Law.
storygeek
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Identify at least five pairs of action reaction forces in the following diagram"
u2l4a13.gif

Source: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/newtlaws/U2L4b.html problem 2

Homework Equations


Newton's third law


The Attempt at a Solution


1) Man and monkey
2)monkey and scale
3)scale and tree
4)man and tree
5) monkey and tree
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would be better off sticking to things that are in actual contact and thus can push/pull against each other. For example, the man is touching the rope, so man and rope can exert forces on each other. But the man is not directly touching the tree, so man and tree do not directly exert forces on each other. (Note: A long range force, like gravity, does not require direct contact.)
 
The best way to deal with things is to draw "bags" around things and see how the forces are acting on that single thing.

* Note *
You might want to think about tension =).
 
Are my attempts to the solutions valid? Man exerts force on Monkey and vice versa. Do indirect forces count in Newton's third law? Like the one between the tree and man.
 
storygeek said:
Are my attempts to the solutions valid? Man exerts force on Monkey and vice versa. Do indirect forces count in Newton's third law? Like the one between the tree and man.
Strictly speaking: No. Only include forces between objects that are in direct contact. (We ignore the teeny tiny gravitational force between man and tree!) The man doesn't really pull on the tree; he pulls on the rope! Redo your answers with this in mind and you'll have a deeper (and more correct) understanding of forces and Newton's 3rd law.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top