Identity Function Clarification: Definition & Examples

AI Thread Summary
The identity function, denoted as IE, maps elements from a set E to themselves, defined by IE(x) = x. It is characterized as the diagonal subset of E x E, consisting of ordered pairs (x, x). The properties of function composition reveal that f o IE = f and IF o f = f, where IF is the identity function on another set F. Clarifications were sought regarding the operation of IF o f, particularly how it applies to elements of E. The identity function is unique for any set E and simply returns its input unchanged, reinforcing its fundamental role in function composition.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
From what I was reading, the apparent definition goes as: The Identity Function on E is the function IE from E into E defined by IE(x) = x. Since IE is the set of all ordered pairs (x,x) such that x ϵ E, IE is also called the diagonal subset of E x E.

If f is a function from E into F, clearly
1. f o IE = f,
2. IF o f = f, in which o is a composition operation

I understood 1., but I'm stuck on understanding on how 2. works. The definition is also confusing me; by how I read it, the identity function is the original function operating on itself...which, as stated, confuses me...any clarifications?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is (I_F\circ f)(x) for some element x of E?
 
Pere Callahan said:
What is (I_F\circ f)(x) for some element x of E?

oh...I sort of understand now...interesting...your presentation suddenly made sense to me...thanks.

In addition, could I get an example of an identity function for some arbitrary function (so I may further clarify my thoughts)?
 
The identity function does not depend on any arbitrary function. It simply is the function I_E:E\to E which returns its argument unchanged, that is I_E(x)=x for all x in E. For any set E, there is exactly one such function.
 
I see...your answer clarifies things for me...thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top