If a crystal has distinguishable sites

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystal
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
compare the number of microstates for crystals consisting of a mixture of A atoms and B atoms if the crystals have 4, 8 and 16 distinguishable sites

the question is ambiguous in that it simply states crystals, so I am assuming its the same as given examples and is 2 crystals AAAA and BBBB.

i don't want a direct answer as its course work, but my questions are:

1) for the most probable macrostate i understand that it would be the most disordered, but am i correct in assuming that "a site" may be considered as an atom in the disorder?

i.e. AABS, BBSA, SAAB etc etc would be the most likely macrostates? where S (an empty site) can be considered in the disorder?

2) also, for a single crystal, i.e. 4 sites, since the sites are distinguishable, does that make the atoms in the sites distinguishable? I'm assuming yes, therefore you would need to consider that AAAA in distinguishable sites must be considered A1A2A3A4, because the site plus the atom would be distinguishable by the distinguishability of the site. that make sense?

thanks for any pointers in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"In modeling the solid state, one typically assumes that the atoms are confined to lattice sites, and that each site is occupied at most once.. In this case, the position in the lattice is a distinguishable label, which makes all atoms distinguishable."

so that's the second question answered.

just need to know if an empty site can be considered as an atom in determining the most probable macrostates
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top