If an electrical generator ran forever would it eventually run out of electrons?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of electrons in the context of electrical generators and electromagnetic induction. Participants explore the origins of electrons, their properties, and the implications of using generators in terms of electron conservation and generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question where the electrons mobilized by electromagnetic induction originate, suggesting that if electrons are waves, they could potentially be generated like other waves.
  • Others clarify that electrons have mass and are conserved, indicating that they cannot be created from nothing and that no electrons are consumed in the generation of electricity.
  • Several participants discuss how the mass of electrons is known, referencing experiments that measure the mass-to-charge ratio and the charge of an electron.
  • A participant explains that an electrical generator does not produce new electrons but rather moves existing electrons within the circuit, likening it to a pump moving water in a closed loop.
  • There is a suggestion that any electrons that might leak could be generated from beta decay, leading to a discussion about the conservation of mass and energy in relation to particle generation.
  • Another participant asserts that electrons do not leak from the conductor and that the conservation of charge is maintained, challenging the idea that beta decay could play a role in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of electron conservation and the mechanisms of electron movement in generators. There is no consensus on the role of beta decay in this context, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of electron behavior in electrical systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various experiments and concepts related to the mass of electrons and conservation laws, but there are unresolved assumptions about the nature of electron behavior in generators and the implications of particle physics.

treehouse
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Where do the electrons that electromagnetic induction mobilizes come from? If electrons are waves as the double-slit experiment demonstrates, couldn't they be generated just as mechanical and light waves are generated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PhysicsForums, treehouse!

Electrons have mass and a few other properties which are conserved. That means you cannot just make them out of the blue. It's a zero sum game.

On the other hand, no electrons are consumed in the generation of electricity!
 
How do we know electrons have mass?
 
treehouse said:
How do we know electrons have mass?

Qualitatively we know that they have mass because beams of electrons are deflected in magnetic or electric fields in a way that indicates that they have a certain ratio of mass to charge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JJ_Tho...sure_the_mass_to_charge_ratio_of_cathode_rays
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millikan_oil_drop_experiment

Those two experiments measured first the mass to charge ratio of electrons (i.e. cathode rays), and then the charge on a single electron (Millikan). If you know those two things, then you know the mass of an electron.
 
treehouse said:
How do we know electrons have mass?

That's kind of a basic question, so I would ask you to look up the definition of mass. You may find it more beneficial to shift your questions to the General Physics forums rather than the Quantum area.

SpectraCat's answer is good.
 
This thread has been moved to the General Physics forum since the answer doesn't have much to do with Quantum Physics.

treehouse said:
Where do the electrons that electromagnetic induction mobilizes come from?

An electrical generator (which uses electromagnetic induction) doesn't actually produce new electrons. The electrons are already in the circuit (wires, etc.) and the generator simply pushes them around. It's like a circular pipe full of water, with a pump inserted into the loop: the pump pushes the water around.
 
jtbell said:
This thread has been moved to the General Physics forum since the answer doesn't have much to do with Quantum Physics.



An electrical generator (which uses electromagnetic induction) doesn't actually produce new electrons. The electrons are already in the circuit (wires, etc.) and the generator simply pushes them around. It's like a circular pipe full of water, with a pump inserted into the loop: the pump pushes the water around.

Oh right! Because the voltage pushes the electrons in the material used to construct the circuit it won't deplete the electrons in the material used the construct the generator because it doesn't actually put the electrons in the material used to construct the generator into the circuit - it just makes the electrons in the material used to construct the circuit move around in the circuit. Thanks jtbell.

I guess any electrons that leak can be generated from b- decay. The resulting proton can turn back into a neutron by b+ decay, so I don't see how DrChinese can argue for the conservation of mass.
 
The generation of particles with mass (AKA everything except for photons) cannot be achieved in a generator. That requires particle colliders or certain nuclear decays. The electrons in the conductor do not leak out, as there is no net charge anywhere on the conductor. If charges leaked out the conductor would become charged, thereby attracting charges back to itself. This is not the case. The electrons stay within the conductor itself the whole time.
 
treehouse said:
I guess any electrons that leak can be generated from b- decay. The resulting proton can turn back into a neutron by b+ decay, so I don't see how DrChinese can argue for the conservation of mass.

:smile: You might want to rethink that a bit. Generators don't produce a lot of beta decay (as in none). And beta decay doesn't involve a change in total energy anyway. Because of conservation. And if you ever saw a proton turn into a neutron, that would be quite remarkable as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K