If c = A· E, then A - cE = 0.

  • Thread starter Thread starter press
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between a vector A and its component along a unit vector E, specifically exploring the expression A - cE, where c is defined as the dot product A·E. Participants are examining the geometric implications of this relationship and questioning the conditions under which A - cE is considered to be zero or perpendicular to E.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Geometric interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the meaning of the expression A - cE and its relationship to the vector E. There is confusion regarding whether A - cE can be equated to zero or if it is simply perpendicular to E. Some participants are exploring the geometric interpretation of the vectors involved and questioning the necessity of certain equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively questioning assumptions and clarifying definitions. Some have offered insights into the geometric relationships between the vectors, while others are still seeking a clearer understanding of the implications of the expressions being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the properties of unit vectors and the implications of the dot product in the context of vector components. Participants are also reflecting on the geometric representation of the vectors and the relationships between them.

press
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let E be any unit vector, that is a vector of norm 1. Let c be the component
of A along E. We saw that c = A·E. Then A - cE is perpendicular to E, and A = A - cE + cE
Then A - cE is also perpendicular to cE ...

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I just can't seem to figure where they got A - cE = 0 from. Everyone just shows A - cE = 0 is true on its own instead of showing if c = A·E, then A - cE = 0* which is what I think the author means by "We saw that c = A·E. Then A - cE is perpendicular to E".

Please, elaborate a little. Thanks.

edit: * if c = A·E, then A - cE · E = 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Eh? Where does it say A - cE = 0? Are you trying to prove that A-cE is perpendicular to E?
 
qspeechc said:
Eh? Where does it say A - cE = 0? Are you trying to prove that A-cE is perpendicular to E?

Oh yeah, A - cE . E = 0

My bad.
 
You mean (A-cE)·E=0, I suppose. Geometrically, if E is a unit vector, then is cE not the vector component of A along E? So what is A-cE?

EDIT: heh, I wrote something silly, so I had to delete it
 
Last edited:
qspeechc said:
You mean (A-cE)·E=0, I suppose. Geometrically, if E is a unit vector, then is cE not the vector component of A along E? So what is A-cE?

My book has the picture of this situation. Geometrically it's clear that A-cE is a vector perpendicular to E and cE.

A = A - cE + cE by parallelogram law. But why do we need A = A - cE + cE to see that A-cE is also perpendicular to cE when (A-cE)· E=0 implies (A-cE)· cE=0?

qspeechc said:
(A-cE)·E = (A-A·E·E)·E

Right? What is E·E when E is a unit vector?

E·E = 1.
 
Yeah, that second part I wrote is clearly rubbish, so I deleted it. The scalar product of three vectors is nonsense, because the product of two is a scalar.

A = A - cE + cE because -cE+cE=0. I think the point about A = A - cE + cE is that A = (A - cE) + cE, i.e. the vectors A, (A-cE) and cE form a right-angled triangle, with A as the hypotenuse. This is obvious geometrically, and I don't know what more is required.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K