If light-speed is invariant,why RoS exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ash64449
  • Start date Start date
ash64449
Messages
356
Reaction score
15
This is a question from Einstein's thought experiment.

This thought experiment is found in this article: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/einstein/works/1910s/relative/relativity.pdf

For those who know that thought experiment,i would like to ask a few questions.

To an observer outside two lightning striking the train are simultaneous.

Well,we know that light speed is invariant,it travels at the same speed regardless of whether the observer is moving or not.

Well,there is an observer in train.
Train is moving in uniform motion. Since rest and uniform motion are indistinguishable in his reference frame,he considers himself as at rest. lightning strikes are simultaneous in outside frame,we know that light travels at the same speed. So light from both the lightning strikes must reach the observer in train in the middle at the same time,because light speed is invariant regardless of the motion of the train. So Observer in the middle of the train must come to the conclusion that lightning strikes are simultaneous.

Yet Einstein's thought experiment says that this cannot happen. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a space-time diagram, from the stations point of view. The two light signals will meet at the midpoint in the station frame. The train will have moved since then, however, so that won't be the midpoint of the train.
 
The observer in the train is moving toward the lightning strike ahead and moving away from the lightning strike behind. This observer is not in the middle.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top