If one generator commutes with all other,why must it be generator of U(1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generator
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:

If one generator of a Lie algebra commutes with all other generator,then why must this generator be the generator of U(1) trasformation?(I know that generator of U(1) commutes with all other generators).

By the way,compact simple Lie algebras belong to 3 families called classical groups,with only 5 exceptions.What are the five exceptions?(QFT of Peskin and Schroeder)

Thank you very much in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
If one generator of a Lie algebra commutes with all other generator,then why must this generator be the generator of U(1) transformation?(I know that generator of U(1) commutes with all other generators).
This question needs more context to be answered properly, but I guess you're dealing with a case where the representation of the other generators is irreducible. If so, I suspect Schur's lemma applies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schur's_lemma

This leads to the generator in question being a multiple of the identity, which generates U(1) when represented on a Hilbert space (i.e., when exponentiated to become a unitary operator).

By the way, compact simple Lie algebras belong to 3 families called classical groups,with only 5 exceptions.What are the five exceptions?

Well (surprise!) they are the "exceptional groups".

See the section "Exceptional cases" in this Wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exceptional_group
which also has links to details of these groups.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top