If raindrops fell with no air drag how long would it take?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iluvpandas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Air drag Drag
AI Thread Summary
If raindrops fell without air drag from a height of 1.6 kilometers, the time it would take to reach the ground can be calculated using the equation d = 0.5gt^2, where g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²). The initial calculations mistakenly omitted taking the square root of the final result, leading to confusion about the correct answer. After correcting the error, the proper time to fall is derived from the equation, resulting in a value of approximately 22.8 seconds. The discussion highlights the importance of careful calculations and understanding of physics equations in solving such problems. Ultimately, the correct approach confirms the time it takes for raindrops to fall without air resistance.
iluvpandas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If there were no air drag, how fast would drops fall from a cloud 1.6 kilometer above the Earth's surface?

Homework Equations


am i heading in the right direction if not what am i doing wrong?


The Attempt at a Solution



i tried converting to m first then i divided both by 2 getting

2d=at^2 and then i divided both by the acceleration which i assumed to be gravity (9.8) after that i had 2(1600)/9.8=t^2 and to get rid of the exponet i rooted both sides and got 326.5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes,

d = 0.5gt^2 + v_0*t
v_0 = 0
1.6km = 0.5*9.81*t^2
t = 326..
 
when i ented the answer the web assignment said it was wrong though and now I am kind of confused as to what i did wrong.
 
iluvpandas said:
when i ented the answer the web assignment said it was wrong though and now I am kind of confused as to what i did wrong.

Because it is sqrt(326). I just recognized that. I also forgot to take square root
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top