IF tachyons existed,would they violate causality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter byron178
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Causality
byron178
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
IF tachyons existed,would they violate causality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Because they haven't been detected and are thought to be to unstable to exist according to mainstream science I believe. I don't have anything to go off of other than that article though.
 


I was once crammed into a New York taxicab with Freeman Dyson and about six other people, and when Dyson was asked about the possible existence of tachyons he replied that there was an inconsistency in their thermodynamics. I believe he was referring to the vacuum instability, as described in the Wikipedia article on Tachyon Condensation.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
494
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
4K
Back
Top