If the height of the water slide is h = 3.2m and the person's initial

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the swimmer's splashdown location from a water slide with a height of 3.2 meters and an initial speed of 0.54 m/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using the change in height (Δh) rather than the absolute heights when applying conservation of energy principles. There is confusion regarding the correct values to substitute into the potential energy equation, with clarification that "h" represents the height difference, not the height above the water level. A diagram is suggested to better visualize the problem, and it's noted that the vertical position should be measured from the water level for accurate calculations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for determining the swimmer's final speed and splashdown point.
Cody
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"If the height of the water slide is h = 3.2m and the person's initial speed at point A (at the top of slide) is 0.54m/s, at what location does the swimmer splash down in the pool?"

I saw a thread with the same question back from 2005 but it is now closed.
I understand that you have to use conservation of energy at point A and at the bottom of the slide to find velocity at the bottom of the slide, then use the formula x = v√2y/g.

I am however confused with the following:
Why can I not substitute the exact values for h into the formula i.e
mgh + 1/2 mv^2 = mgh + 1/2 mv^2
since it is known, but rather have to use h-1.50(for the bottom) and 1.50(for the top)

Hope someone understands what I am asking.
Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cody said:
I am however confused with the following:
Why can I not substitute the exact values for h into the formula i.e
mgh + 1/2 mv^2 = mgh + 1/2 mv^2
since it is known, but rather have to use h-1.50(for the bottom) and 1.50(for the top)
You need to provide a diagram (or simply a link to the original problem). Or at least describe the slide in more detail.

What matters when calculating the velocity at the bottom of the slide is Δh. So as long as you get that right, your proposed method should work fine.

You can use any point as your reference level, where y = 0.
 
Found out how to attach a link. here's the picture
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.png
    Picture1.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 940
Last edited:
Find the change in potential energy from the top of the slide to the bottom. Use this to find the final speed of the girl.

We can worry about where she lands afterwards.
 
Cody said:
Found out how to attach a link. here's the picture
Good.

Cody said:
but rather have to use h-1.50(for the bottom) and 1.50(for the top)
I have no idea why you think you have to use this (which is wrong, by the way).

The diagram shows the height of the bottom of the slide to be 1.50 m; the height at the top is that plus an additional "h".
 
This is the solution I have. If I substitute the exact values for h (i.e. 1.50 at the bottom of the slide and 3.2 at the top), I don't get the same answer. I don't know if I am doing something wrong or if you just cannot substitute the exact values for h into your equation, but rather have to use h+1.50 and h.
 

Attachments

  • Picture2.png
    Picture2.png
    42.5 KB · Views: 1,493
Cody said:
This is the solution I have. If I substitute the exact values for h (i.e. 1.50 at the bottom of the slide and 3.2 at the top), I don't get the same answer. I don't know if I am doing something wrong or if you just cannot substitute the exact values for h into your equation, but rather have to use h+1.50 and h.
I think you are getting confused about the meaning of "h" in this problem. Here, h is simply the change in height of the slide from top to bottom; h is not the distance from the top of the slide to the water level.

In your formula for potential energy, use ##mgy## instead of ##mgh##, where "y" is the vertical position measured from the water level. ##y_A## ≠ 3.2. (h = 3.2)

Your first job is to figure out what ##y_A## and ##y_B## equal.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top