If the state |psi> is normalised, what is the value of |c|?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueyellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Psi State Value
blueyellow

Homework Statement



The observable A is represented by operator A-hat. The eigenvectors of A-hat are |phi1> and |phi2> which are orthonormal. The corresponding eigenvalues are +1 and -1 respectively. The system is prepared in a state |psi> given by

|psi>=(4/10)|phi1>+c|phi2>

a) If the state |psi> is normalised what is the value of |c|?
b) Calculate the numerical value of the expectation value of A-hat in the state |psi>.
c) With the system in the state |psi> a measurement of observable A is made. What is the probability of obtaining the eigenvalue -1?
d) Immediately after the measurement is made, with the result -1, what is now the expectation value of A-hat? Explain your answer briefly.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) <psi| psi>=1

integral from -infinity to infinity of (16/100)+(c^2)+(8/10)c=1

[((16/100)+(c^2)+(8/10)c)x]=1

(2*16/100)a+2(c^2)a+(16/10)ca=1
(8/25)a+2(c^2)a+(16/10)ca=1
(8/25)a+2(c^2)a+(8/5)ca=1
a[(8/25)+2(c^2)+(8/5)c]=1
(8/25)+(2(c^2))+(8/5)c=1/a
2(c^2)+(8/5)c+(8/25)-(1/a)=0
c=[(-8/5)+sqrt((8/5)^2 -4*2*((8/25)-(1/a))))]/4
c=[(-8/5)-sqrt((8/5)^2 -4*2*((8/25)-(1/a))))]/4

this seems way too complicated. Have I done something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A is an observable, so Ahat is an Hermitian operator. This mean that its eigenfunctions are orthogonal. This means that <psi|psi> = 16/100 <phi1|phi1> + c^2 <phi2|phi2>. Now assume that |phi1> and |phi2> are also normalized, then we get 1 = 16/100 + c^2, so c=sqrt(84/100)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top