If two trains traveling at 0.5c collide head on

  • Thread starter Thread starter CombustionMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head Trains
CombustionMan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What would happen? These two trains are on the same tracks moving at constant velocities towards each other (0.5c --> and <--0.5c I guess) so what would happen? Since all motion is relative and no mass can travel at the speed of light something else must happen instead of a light speed head-on collision, right? I'm just curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The difficulty is in accepting that unlike at low velocities, where two objects moving at say 60mph are additive and so the relative velocity is 120mph, at speeds approaching c this is not the case.

The most a mass object could achieve would be something approaching a relative speed of 1c. There would be a very large explosion though and a lot of energy would be produced.

The Lorentz transforms explain it but essentially at significant fractions of light speed, the dilation of time and space means that relative velocities are always below 1c.

\ \gamma = \frac{1}{ \sqrt{1 - { \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}}

Which leads to the composition of velocities equation:

Where 2 moving bodies are w and v

291bfd8042576ef4c34fb191693e72c0.png


Best way to imagine it is to try and understand what time and motion dilation means, distance and time are equivalently dilated by motions that approach significant fractions of c, so that the relative concerns mean that they are effectively traveling through time space that is becoming "stretched" and hence the relative motion of mass objects becomes more dilated as they near velocities approaching c until the dilation itself prevents anything with mass achieving this limit. Probably not a very good explanation but meh.
 
Last edited:
I think I understand, so since they are traveling through "stretched" time their relative velocities go below 1c?
 
The formula for the relative speeds of two objects moving toward each other with speeds (relative to a third observer) of u and v i s NOT "u+ v". The speed of each relative to the other will be
\frac{u+ v}{1+ \frac{uv}{c^2}}

In particular, if u= v= c/2, then the speed of either one relative to the other is
\frac{\frac{c}{2}+ \frac{c}{2}}{1+ \frac{\frac{c}{2}\frac{c}{2}}{c^2}}= \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{1+ \frac{1}{4}}= \frac{4}{5}c
 
CombustionMan said:
I think I understand, so since they are traveling through "stretched" time their relative velocities go below 1c?

Yup pretty much although it's stretched time and space, space-time. You can play with Ivy's equations yourself to show that speeds always approach c just by plugging some numbers in.

It's more interesting if you take the case of .999c and then you would imagine the relative velocities are 1.998c which is clearly impossible but again just plugging the numbers in the dilation effects conserve c as a limit.

Interestingly we can observe this with GPS satellites, since the gravitation in space is slightly lower than on Earth and the relative speeds although far slower than c become significant over time. Without adjustments they can go out of synch fairly significantly in quite short periods of time. So to adjust for it they lower the frequency of clocks so that they take account of the respective dilation effects.

They have also placed Caesium clocks on tall buildings and flown them around the world to show extremely small variations that are predicted by the theory.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
998
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top