The discussion centers around the concept of a non-combustible, self-sustaining energy source that generates zero radiation, exploring potential propulsion systems that could be designed using such a source. The scope includes theoretical considerations, practical applications, and the implications for long-duration travel.
Participants express various ideas about the potential applications of the proposed energy source, but there is no consensus on the specifics of propulsion systems or the implications of the 'self-sustaining' characteristic. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical viability of the concepts presented.
Limitations include the ambiguity surrounding the definition of 'self-sustaining' and the assumptions about the energy source's characteristics, such as its power output and operational constraints.
One good approach would be to use the energy to power an electrical generator. Then there is a multitude of electrical devices already developed and ready to use that power. That is how nuclear energy is used now by aircraft carriers and submarines. In aerospace, the issues of weight and safety are critical.Dee said:
If we ignore the 'self-sustaining' part to keep things within the realm of real physics, then you're basically talking about anything that could be powered by electricity. I believe anything with a propeller or a turbine would work, and if you can quickly heat a gas then anything that runs on rapid gas expansion.Dee said:
most excellent, then I will look into those generators. Thank you. i appreciate the help without the i can't possibly do it. Imagine if every person whos defied the laws of their modern science just didn't. lolFactChecker said:
That sentence is very hard to parse in English, but please remember that we don't defy any laws of science here at PF. We discuss mainstream science here, which is why you got that helpful answer from @FactCheckerDee said:
