The discussion centers on the potential for a non-combustible, self-sustaining energy source that generates zero radiation and its implications for propulsion systems. Participants suggest utilizing electrical generators to power existing propulsion technologies, such as turbines and propellers, similar to how nuclear energy is harnessed in aircraft carriers and submarines. The conversation emphasizes the importance of power output, specifically wattage, in determining the feasibility of such a propulsion system. Additionally, the forum prohibits discussions on free energy devices or perpetual motion, reinforcing a focus on established scientific principles.
PREREQUISITESAerospace engineers, energy researchers, and anyone interested in advanced propulsion technologies and sustainable energy solutions.
One good approach would be to use the energy to power an electrical generator. Then there is a multitude of electrical devices already developed and ready to use that power. That is how nuclear energy is used now by aircraft carriers and submarines. In aerospace, the issues of weight and safety are critical.Dee said:
If we ignore the 'self-sustaining' part to keep things within the realm of real physics, then you're basically talking about anything that could be powered by electricity. I believe anything with a propeller or a turbine would work, and if you can quickly heat a gas then anything that runs on rapid gas expansion.Dee said:
most excellent, then I will look into those generators. Thank you. i appreciate the help without the i can't possibly do it. Imagine if every person whos defied the laws of their modern science just didn't. lolFactChecker said:
That sentence is very hard to parse in English, but please remember that we don't defy any laws of science here at PF. We discuss mainstream science here, which is why you got that helpful answer from @FactCheckerDee said:
