If we have a non combustible power source

AI Thread Summary
A non-combustible, self-sustaining energy source that generates zero radiation could potentially power various propulsion systems, primarily those reliant on electricity, such as turbines or propellers. Current technologies, like those used in nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines, illustrate practical applications of electrical generators. Discussions emphasize the importance of considering the power output of such a device, as it influences the feasibility of propulsion systems. The conversation also highlights the need to adhere to established scientific principles, avoiding concepts like perpetual motion. Exploring existing electrical devices can provide insights into practical propulsion solutions.
Dee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Traveling for generations
If i create a non combustible self-sustaining energy source that generates zero radiation, what kind of propulsion system could be designed? Is someone out there with that type of propulsion system already?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dee said:
TL;DR Summary: Traveling for generations

If i create a non combustible self-sustaining energy source that generates zero radiation, what kind of propulsion system could be designed? Is someone out there with that type of propulsion system already?
One good approach would be to use the energy to power an electrical generator. Then there is a multitude of electrical devices already developed and ready to use that power. That is how nuclear energy is used now by aircraft carriers and submarines. In aerospace, the issues of weight and safety are critical.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Dee said:
If i create a non combustible self-sustaining energy source that generates zero radiation, what kind of propulsion system could be designed? Is someone out there with that type of propulsion system already?
If we ignore the 'self-sustaining' part to keep things within the realm of real physics, then you're basically talking about anything that could be powered by electricity. I believe anything with a propeller or a turbine would work, and if you can quickly heat a gas then anything that runs on rapid gas expansion.

Note that talk of free energy devices or perpetual motion is not permitted here at PF, in case that's what you meant by 'self-sustaining'.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
FactChecker said:
One good approach would be to use the energy to power an electrical generator. Then there is a multitude of electrical devices already developed and ready to use that power. That is how nuclear energy is used now by aircraft carriers and submarines. In aerospace, the issues of weight and safety are critical.
most excellent, then I will look into those generators. Thank you. i appreciate the help without the i can't possibly do it. Imagine if every person whos defied the laws of their modern science just didn't. lol
 
Dee said:
Imagine if every person whos defied the laws of their modern science just didn't.
That sentence is very hard to parse in English, but please remember that we don't defy any laws of science here at PF. We discuss mainstream science here, which is why you got that helpful answer from @FactChecker :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and russ_watters
If you are looking for practical applications for your proposed power source, you will want to consider its power output - i.e. wattage. Some power sources can last virtually forever but have a very low maximum output (such as the power source aboard the space probes). Others have a virtually unlimited output. Do you know which flavour your device is?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, berkeman and FactChecker
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
Back
Top