If |x| is large, what is f(x) approximately?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumbQuestion
  • Start date Start date
dumbQuestion
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If |x| is large, then f(x)=(x5-x4+x3+x)/(x3-1) is approximately what?

Homework Equations



Just use long division


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I just started out dividing the polys, and I ended up with f(x)=x2-x+1 + (x2+1)/(x3-1)


I thought, well, if x is very large, then the fraction at the end there will begin disapearing and tend towards 0. The solution in the book agreed, but I'm confused about something. The solution in the book says "as the limit as x --> infinity, (x2+1)/(x3-1) = 0, so f(x) ≈x2-x+1 But this doesn't make sense because as x tends to infinity, x2-x+1 will blow up towards infinity. I guess I am just not wrapping my mind around how f(x) is approximately x2-x+1 for |x| "very large". Is it just because the fraction goes to 0 faster than x2-x+1 goes to infinity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially f(x) is infinity +0 to begin, because |x| is large. Work back from that assumption and it seems clear since the limit is infinity
 
Well the book was being a bit sloppy - as x gets very large f(x) approaches infinity as the function y=x2-x+1.

It means:
If you plotted the whole f(x), and the quadratic y as a dotted line, you'll find that f(x) gets closer and closer to following the dotted line. That is how f(x) approaches infinity.
 
The graphs of f(x) and x2-x+1 will become very close together as x gets large, because the difference between them goes to zero. It doesn't matter that they are both going to infinity. They will still be close together as they do.
 
asymptote
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top