Illustrate Hydrogen Bonding: Amino Acids

AI Thread Summary
Structures illustrating hydrogen bonding interactions in amino acids were evaluated, revealing that structure 4 is incorrect due to the absence of hydrogen bonding. Structure 3 was also deemed invalid as the amino acid configuration with -OH does not exist. Structures 1 and 2 are considered potentially correct, with structure 1 being favored due to the appropriate electronegativity difference between nitrogen and hydrogen. A key guideline for hydrogen bonding is that only hydrogens bonded to fluorine, nitrogen, or oxygen can participate in these interactions. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately identifying hydrogen bonding in protein structures.
MightyMan11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following structures illustrate hydrogen bonding interactions between amino acid side chains and/or backbone atoms within a protein structure. In which of the following figures are the structures and hydrogen bonding completely correct?


Homework Equations


Picture2.png



The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly, I know that structure 4 is wrong (does not involve hydrogen).
A quick glance at my textbook shows that the amino acid with the configuration of -OH shown in structure 3 does not exist, eliminating 3.
However, I am stuck at 1 & 2 as they seem both correct.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which atoms have hydrogen capable of forming hydrogen bonds?
 
Ah.
The electronegativity difference between sulphur and hydrogen seems to low to have a hydrogen bond.
That would leave structure 1 (also nitrogen and hydrogen have an electronegativity difference that is high enough to create a H-bond).

Thank you,
Ygggdrasil
 
A good rule of thumb is that only hydrogens bonded to fluorine, nitrogen, or hydrogen atoms are capable of participating in hydrogen bonds.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
20K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top