I'm not understanding how to calculate the magnetic field of a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field generated by a static sphere with a constant surface current density, denoted as K in the tangential direction (##\hat \phi##). The initial approach involves breaking the sphere into rings and applying a formula for the magnetic field produced by these rings. Participants clarify that K represents a superficial current density, leading to a revised integral formulation for the magnetic field. There is some debate about the correct integration of ##\sin^2 \theta## and the inclusion of necessary factors, ultimately leading to a consensus on the dimensional analysis of the current density. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the variables and applying the correct mathematical principles to derive the magnetic field.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I need to calculate the magnetic field generated by a static sphere at its center. On the surface of the sphere flows a constant current ##K \hat \phi##.

Now, my guess was that the field produced would be equal to the field produced by a lot of rings, that is, i will split the sphere in a lot of rings, so we have:

$$B_{zring} = \mu I b^2/(2(b^2+z^2))^{3/2}$$

The total field will be:
$$\sum_{\theta} \mu K (R sin \theta)^2/(2(R^3))$$ (since b = Rcos and z = Rsin)

That's the real problem, how do i turn it in a integral?
I think there is some problems regarding my interpretation of the question:
Maybe K is the surface current, and not a current (as a corrent in a simple circuit) itself?
Is it possible to solve b this way?​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
On the surface of the sphere flows a constant current $$K \phi$$.
What is ##\phi## here? Is this as in spherical polar coordinates? Which direction in those coordinates?
 
haruspex said:
What is ##\phi## here? Is this as in spherical polar coordinates? Which direction in those coordinates?
Ops, yes. ##\hat \phi## would be the unit tengential vector
1623894776807.png
 
Herculi said:
Ops, yes. \phi would be the unit tengential vectorView attachment 284577
Oh, so it is ##K\hat\phi##? And it is a current density, yes?
 
haruspex said:
Oh, so it is ##K\hat\phi##?
Just realized now that it makes more sense to be the superificial current density.

If it is the case, ##B = \int \mu (Rsin(\theta)^2 K R d\theta/(2*(R)^3) = \int \mu K sin^2 \theta d\theta / 2 = \mu K 2/3## Is it right??
 
Herculi said:
Just realized now that it makes more sense to be the superificial current density.

If it is the case, ##B = \int \mu (Rsin(\theta)^2 K R d\theta/(2*(R)^3) = \int \mu K sin^2 \theta d\theta / 2 = \mu K 2/3## Is it right??
I don't agree with the last step. What is the integral of ##\sin^2##?
 
Herculi said:
Just realized now that it makes more sense to be the superificial current density.

If it is the case, ##B = \int \mu (Rsin(\theta)^2 K R d\theta/(2*(R)^3) = \int \mu K sin^2 \theta d\theta / 2 = \mu K 2/3## Is it right??
I think you also forgot a factor of ##\frac{1}{R}## in the result.
 
Delta2 said:
I think you also forgot a factor of ##\frac{1}{R}## in the result.
All the Rs cancelled.
K is a linear current density, so has dimension Q/(TL).
 
haruspex said:
All the Rs cancelled.
Yes sorry now I see the numerator is in fact ##(R\sin\theta)^2Rd\theta##. And of course by dimensional analysis you are right also :D
 
Back
Top