I'm not understanding how to calculate the magnetic field of a sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field generated by a static sphere with a constant surface current flowing along the surface. Participants are exploring the implications of the current density and the mathematical formulation needed to derive the magnetic field at the center of the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the idea of modeling the sphere as a series of rings to calculate the magnetic field. There are questions about the interpretation of the current density and its representation in spherical coordinates. Some participants express uncertainty about the integration process and the factors involved in the calculations.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the problem with various interpretations being discussed. Participants are questioning assumptions about the nature of the current density and its implications for the magnetic field calculation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the dimensional analysis of the current density, but no consensus has been reached on the final expression for the magnetic field.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential ambiguities regarding the definition of the current density and its representation in the context of the problem. There is also a focus on ensuring the mathematical formulation aligns with physical principles.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I need to calculate the magnetic field generated by a static sphere at its center. On the surface of the sphere flows a constant current ##K \hat \phi##.

Now, my guess was that the field produced would be equal to the field produced by a lot of rings, that is, i will split the sphere in a lot of rings, so we have:

$$B_{zring} = \mu I b^2/(2(b^2+z^2))^{3/2}$$

The total field will be:
$$\sum_{\theta} \mu K (R sin \theta)^2/(2(R^3))$$ (since b = Rcos and z = Rsin)

That's the real problem, how do i turn it in a integral?
I think there is some problems regarding my interpretation of the question:
Maybe K is the surface current, and not a current (as a corrent in a simple circuit) itself?
Is it possible to solve b this way?​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
On the surface of the sphere flows a constant current $$K \phi$$.
What is ##\phi## here? Is this as in spherical polar coordinates? Which direction in those coordinates?
 
haruspex said:
What is ##\phi## here? Is this as in spherical polar coordinates? Which direction in those coordinates?
Ops, yes. ##\hat \phi## would be the unit tengential vector
1623894776807.png
 
Herculi said:
Ops, yes. \phi would be the unit tengential vectorView attachment 284577
Oh, so it is ##K\hat\phi##? And it is a current density, yes?
 
haruspex said:
Oh, so it is ##K\hat\phi##?
Just realized now that it makes more sense to be the superificial current density.

If it is the case, ##B = \int \mu (Rsin(\theta)^2 K R d\theta/(2*(R)^3) = \int \mu K sin^2 \theta d\theta / 2 = \mu K 2/3## Is it right??
 
Herculi said:
Just realized now that it makes more sense to be the superificial current density.

If it is the case, ##B = \int \mu (Rsin(\theta)^2 K R d\theta/(2*(R)^3) = \int \mu K sin^2 \theta d\theta / 2 = \mu K 2/3## Is it right??
I don't agree with the last step. What is the integral of ##\sin^2##?
 
Herculi said:
Just realized now that it makes more sense to be the superificial current density.

If it is the case, ##B = \int \mu (Rsin(\theta)^2 K R d\theta/(2*(R)^3) = \int \mu K sin^2 \theta d\theta / 2 = \mu K 2/3## Is it right??
I think you also forgot a factor of ##\frac{1}{R}## in the result.
 
Delta2 said:
I think you also forgot a factor of ##\frac{1}{R}## in the result.
All the Rs cancelled.
K is a linear current density, so has dimension Q/(TL).
 
haruspex said:
All the Rs cancelled.
Yes sorry now I see the numerator is in fact ##(R\sin\theta)^2Rd\theta##. And of course by dimensional analysis you are right also :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
842
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K