Image formed by lens-water-mirror system

  • Thread starter Thread starter ConorDMK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the image position and lateral magnification for a lens-water-mirror system involving a double-convex lens with a focal length of 40 cm in air, submerged in water with a refractive index of 4/3. Participants emphasize the complexity of the algebra involved and suggest a numerical approach to simplify the calculations, particularly due to potential sign errors. The importance of plugging in values progressively is highlighted to ensure the results remain logical throughout the process. Despite the challenges, one participant humorously notes their decision to derive the full algebraic expression for the final image and magnification, adding a light-hearted touch to the technical discussion. The conversation underscores the intricacies of optics problems and the strategies for tackling them effectively.
ConorDMK
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A symmetric, double-convex, thin lens made of glass with n = 1.52 has a focal length in air of 40 cm. The lens is sealed into the opening in the left-hand of a tank filled with water (n = 4/3). At the right-hand end of the tank is a plane mirror 90 cm from the lens. Find the position and lateral magnification of the image formed by the lens-water-mirror system of a small object outside the tank on the lens axis and 70 cm to the left of the lens.

Variables:
f=focal length=40cm,
na=refractive index of air=1,
ng=refractive index of glass=1.52,
nw=refractive index of water=4/3,
x=distance from lens to mirror=90cm,
s1=object distance=70cm

Homework Equations


1/f=(ng-na)(1/R1-1/R2)

na/s1+ng/s'1=(ng-na)/R1

ng/s2+nw/s'2=(nw-ng)/R2

The Attempt at a Solution


As the lens is symmetrical, R1=-R2
⇒ 1/f=(ng-na)(1/R1-1/R2)=(ng-na)(1/R1+1/R1)
⇒ 1/f=(ng-na)(2/R1)
⇒ R1=2f(ng-na)

Using -s'1=s2
na/s1+ng/s'1=(ng-na)/R1
⇒s'1=ng/(((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1))

s2=ng/(((nw-ng)/(-R1))-(ng/s'2))

⇒-ng/(((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1))=ng/(((nw-ng)/(-R1))-(ng/s'2))

⇒((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1)=((nw-ng)/R1)+(ng/s'2)

⇒s'2=nw/(((ng-na)/R1)-(na/s1)-((nw-ng)/R1))

And s3=x-s'2

But this is where my friends and I get bogged down in where everything is supposed to be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest that you plug in numbers as you go so that you work out each step numerically. I know this goes against the general rule of working all the way to the end symbolically and then substituting numbers, but the algebra in this case is obviously getting out of hand. By plugging the numbers in as you go, you can also see if your answers are making sense as you go. This problem is a field of land mines in regard to signs.
 
TSny said:
I suggest that you plug in numbers as you go so that you work out each step numerically. I know this goes against the general rule of working all the way to the end symbolically and then substituting numbers, but the algebra in this case is obviously getting out of hand. By plugging the numbers in as you go, you can also see if your answers are making sense as you go. This problem is a field of land mines in regard to signs.

That's the line of thinking that we decided to go down in the end. And having done that, I decided to do the full algebraic expression for the final image and final magnification anyway, just to annoy the people marking it. I feel like Dr Frankenstein.
 
ConorDMK said:
That's the line of thinking that we decided to go down in the end. And having done that, I decided to do the full algebraic expression for the final image and final magnification anyway, just to annoy the people marking it. I feel like Dr Frankenstein.
:oldbiggrin:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top