Image Magnification: Find Height of Image with f=42

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height of an image produced by a lens with a focal length of 42 cm when a 3.0 cm-high object is placed 52 cm away. The initial attempt at finding the image distance (di) resulted in an incorrect value due to arithmetic errors. After correcting the calculations, the image distance was found to be 218.4 cm, leading to a height of -12.6 cm, indicating an inverted image. Participants noted that while the negative height reflects inversion, it should be reported as a positive value for clarity in computer inputs. The conversation highlights the challenges of rounding and the limitations of computerized grading systems in interpreting physical concepts.
Noreturn
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f=42[/B]
Find the height of the image produced when a 3.0 cm -high object is placed at distance f+10cm

Homework Equations


u13l3f1.gif

The Attempt at a Solution



1/52= 1/3 +1/di

di=49

However, this is wrong for some reason. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • u13l3f1.gif
    u13l3f1.gif
    230 bytes · Views: 741
Physics news on Phys.org
## f=42 ## and doesn't change. ## d_o=f+10=52 ##. Find ## d_i ##. After you do that, there's one more formula that you need. ## \\ ## Incidentally, your arithmetic is incorrect: ## 1/52 \neq 1/3+1/49 ##. When you solve for ## d_i ## on this second try, you need to compute it with proper arithmetic.
 
Charles Link said:
## f=42 ## and doesn't change. ## d_o=f+10=52 ##. Find ## d_i ##. After you do that, there's one more formula that you need. ## \\ ## Incidentally, your arithmetic is incorrect: ## 1/52 \neq 1/3+1/49 ##. When you solve for ## d_i ## on this second try, you need to compute it with proper arithmetic.

So di= 218.4

hi/ho=-di/do

hi/3=218.4/52

hi=-12.6cm

That is still wrong tho. I know it can't be negative just tells us it's inverted. Where did I go wrong?
 
Noreturn said:
So di= 218.4

hi/ho=-di/do

hi/3=218.4/52

hi=-12.6cm

That is still wrong tho. I know it can't be negative just tells us it's inverted. Where did I go wrong?
I agree with your answer. If it is a computer program, try inputting +12.6 cm. Usually these images are specified with positive heights even though they are inverted.
 
So I guess it wanted it input as a negative, (even though height can't be negative?). So when I do -12.6 it says very close try/check rounding. However when I do ((1/42)-(1/52))^-1 I get 4.2 so multiply that by 3 it's 12.6 even.
 
Noreturn said:
So I guess it wanted it input as a negative, (even though height can't be negative?). So when I do -12.6 it says very close try/check rounding. However when I do ((1/42)-(1/52))^-1 I get 4.2 so multiply that by 3 it's 12.6 even.
It's very fussy if it expects an answer of ##h=-13 ## cm because of two sig figs when the exact answer is 12.6. If I were giving it as a problem, I would call the answer ## h=+12.6 ## cm. One problem with computerized answers is that they are incapable of doing any thinking.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top