In euclidean quantum field theory, the imaginary part of the free energy, defined as the logaritm of the partition function, is it connected to the decay rate?
The free energy has two types of components, one without Levi-Civita pseudotensor (normal parity) and another with the epsilon tensor (abnormal parity).
In Euclidean field theory the normal parity component is always real, and the abnormal parity component is imaginary (see e.g.,
L. Alvarez-Gaume. E. Witten, Nucl.Phys. B234 (1984) 269).
In Minkowskian space both components are real if there is no phase space to decay, but develop an imaginary part above threshold (decay, inelastic channels, etc).
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!