Impedance equivs and complex numbers.

AI Thread Summary
Equivalent impedances in circuits can be calculated by finding a common denominator and adding the terms, while remembering that j*j = -1. Rationalizing the denominators by using the complex conjugate simplifies the process, allowing for the addition of real and imaginary parts. For the given example, the calculation leads to an equivalent impedance of approximately 0.3331 - 25.49j. Another method involves converting Cartesian impedances into polar admittances for addition, then converting back to obtain the equivalent impedance. Multiple approaches exist for these calculations, and the choice of method may vary based on individual preference.
seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm finding equivalent impedances of circuits, and I always run into things like this:

1/(-j25) + 1/(600 +j900) = 1/Zeq

I don't know how to proceed from here. I know this is more of a math issue than anything else, but I appreciate your help
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just put them over a common denominator and add. Remember that j*j=-1 and you should be fine.
 
What works best for me is to rationalise the denominators (by multiplying numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator) then simply adding real and imaginary parts. After rationalising, the denominator will be the square of the modulus while the numerator will be the conjugate. Also, remember that 1/j = -j.
So for your example you would go:
1/(-j25) + 1/(600 +j900) = j/25 + (600 - 900j)/(600^2 + 900^2) = 600/1170000 + (1/25 - 900/1170000)j = 1/1950 + j51/1300 = 1/Z
-> Z = 1/(1/1950 + j51/1300) = (1/1950 - j51/1300)/(1/1950^2 + (51/1300)^2) = 0.3331 - 25.49j
Alternatively, you could convert the cartesian impedances into polar admitances then add them (admitances in parallel add) and put the result into polar form and invert to obtain the equivalent impedance.
There are many ways of doing these calculations. I'm not sure which is quickest.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top