Implicit function / Separable ODE

Ted Burgess
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The final step of solving a separable ODE is to find a function, f, defined implicitly by a relation

G(y) = H(x).

Say G(y) isn't defined at y = a and H(x) isn't defined at x = b, it appears to me that when rearranging such a relation to put y in terms of x, the point at which G(y) isn't defined isn't 'important' because it doesn't correspond to a point where y = f(x) is defined anyway.

Is this the case and if so, why?

Example

H(y) = G(x) = 1 / (y-1) = x
H(y) defined for all real values except y = 0
G(x) defined for all real values.

Rearrangement gives,

y = f(x) = 1 + 1 / x

and no value of x will solve f(x) = 1

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point where G(y) is not defined is usually important. This is because you get G(y) by integrating some g(y), which is typically made by dividing some f(y), originally on the left, by h(y), originally on the right. And h(y) = 0 may well correspond to the singular points of G(y). What needs to be done is research whether h(y) results in any special solutions of the original equation (which is significantly simplified in this case). For example:

y' = y^2 => y'/y^2 = 1 => -1/y = t + C => y = -1/(t + C) (*)

However, y^2 = 0 => y = 0, which is a singular solution not given by (*).
 
Thanks very much for your response but, to use your example, suppose the original differential equation is

y' / y^2 = 1 instead of y' = y^2

what I'm wanting to find out is why the rearranged solution of y' / y^2 doesn't seem to go through the singular point of 1 / y^2

Thanks
 
Because the function on the right would have to be infinite. In our example, C has to be infinite, or the independent variable has to be infinite. Among other things, that means that the solution is not unique (it is satisfied for any initial value of x). The loss of uniqueness is the more general property of singular solutions. For example, y'^2 = 4y => y = (x + c)^2. There are no infinities involved, however at x = -c all the solutions go through y = 0, which is a singular solution as well. In this case, by the way, no constant of integration can be manipulated to obtain the singular solution.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
965
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top