Implicit Function Thm Application

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
Investigate the possibility of solving x2-4x+2y2-yz = 1 for each of its variables in terms of the other two near the point (2,-1,3).

Attempt:

Ok so using the IFT I was able to determine that I can only slze for y,z. But in the question they ask me to solve for y and z. z was not problem, but y, they got a solution like this:

y = (z - [z2+8(1-x2+4x)]1/2) / 4

as well they said x = 2 (+ or -) [5-2y2+yz]1/2 and the square root vanishes at (y,z) = (-1,3) so there are two values of “ for some nearby values of and
and none for others.

Question: How did they solve for y? (What bloody algebra trick did they use that I'm not seeing? and how did those conditions on x appear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi trap101! :smile:
trap101 said:
x2-4x+2y2-yz = 1

y = (z - [z2+8(1-x2+4x)]1/2) / 4

that's the standard -b ± √etc formula :wink:
as well they said x = 2 (+ or -) [5-2y2+yz]1/2 and the square root vanishes at (y,z) = (-1,3) so there are two values of “ for some nearby values of and
and none for others.

your typing hasn't come out :redface:
 
trap101 said:
as well they said x = 2 (+ or -) [5-2y2+yz]1/2 and the square root vanishes at (y,z) = (-1,3) so there are two values of “ for some nearby values of and ��
and none for others.

there are two values of x for some nearby values of y and z
and none for others.
Well after doing the mechanics for solving for y, I guess in that sort of scenario I should assume the other "variables" in this case x, z are just constants?
 
Last edited:
trap101 said:
Well after doing the mechanics for solving for y, I guess in that sort of scenario I should assume the other "variables" in this case x, z are just constants?

yup! :biggrin:
 
thnks again and won't be the last time, unless I get struck by lightning and all of a sudden I become a genius
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top