Improper integrals and solids of revolution

phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let n>1/2 and consider the function

f(x)=x^{-n} for x\in[1,∞)

Calculate the volume of the solid generated by rorating f(x) about the x-axis, showing all details of your working.

Homework Equations



Since it is rotated about the x-axis, its axis of symmetry is the x-axis, and by slicing up the solid of revolution into circles perpendicular to the x-axis, the volume is given by

V=lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}A(x)dx
A= \pi r^{2}=\pi(x^{-n})^{2}

So

V=lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}\pi(x^{-n})^{2}dx

The Attempt at a Solution



V= \pi lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}(x^{-n})^{2}dx


= \pi lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}(x^{-2n})dx

= \pi lim_{t→∞} \frac{x^{-2n+1}}{-2n+1}|^{t}_{1}

= \pi lim_{t→∞} \frac{1}{-2n+1}(t^{-2n+1}-1)

= \frac{\pi}{-2n+1}

So a few questions. First, am I right? Second, should I do another substitution with the limit and turn it into the limit as s goes to 0 where t=1/s? Appreciate any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phosgene said:

Homework Statement



Let n>1/2 and consider the function

f(x)=x^{-n} for x\in[1,∞)

Calculate the volume of the solid generated by rorating f(x) about the x-axis, showing all details of your working.

Homework Equations



Since it is rotated about the x-axis, its axis of symmetry is the x-axis, and by slicing up the solid of revolution into circles perpendicular to the x-axis, the volume is given by

V=lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}A(x)dx
A= \pi r^{2}=\pi(x^{-n})^{2}

So

V=lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}\pi(x^{-n})^{2}dx

The Attempt at a Solution



V= \pi lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}(x^{-n})^{2}dx


= \pi lim_{t→∞}∫^{t}_{1}(x^{-2n})dx

= \pi lim_{t→∞} \frac{x^{-2n+1}}{-2n+1}|^{t}_{1}

= \pi lim_{t→∞} \frac{1}{-2n+1}(t^{-2n+1}-1)

= \frac{\pi}{-2n+1}

So a few questions. First, am I right? Second, should I do another substitution with the limit and turn it into the limit as s goes to 0 where t=1/s? Appreciate any help :)

You are almost right. But if you put a number n>1/2 into that shouldn't you get something positive? And taking your limit works precisely because (-2n+1)<0, right? Just make sure you are clear on that. No need to do the limit another way.
 
Oops, you're right. I messed up the last step and forgot to multiply by the negative 1. Thanks :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top