Improving Accuracy in Measuring Density: Tips and Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack edison
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
To reduce uncertainty in measuring the density of a material, focus on minimizing errors in both mass and volume measurements. Using precise instruments and techniques can enhance accuracy, as greater measurements typically yield lower percentage uncertainties. Changing the material to achieve a higher density is not a valid approach, as it complicates the problem. Clarifying the specific method used for density determination can also aid in improving measurement accuracy. Ultimately, a systematic approach to measurement will lead to more reliable density calculations.
jack edison
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How would you reduce uncertainty when measuring the density of a material

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm guessing you have to reduce the uncertainty in the mass and volume of the material
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, that sure seems like a pretty good guess, since that's what density is calculated from, but HOW do you reduce the uncertainty of either measurement? That's really the question.
 
wouldn't you just use a material with greater mass, ,but lower volume, i.e giving a greater measurement for density.
% uncertainty = uncertainty/measurement * 100

so if the measurement is greater, won't the % uncertainty be less
 
How do you propose that lowering the volume will improve the calculation's uncertainty?

Changing material is cheating. Stick to one problem at a time.
 
as we are calculating density, if we have a lower volume, we will have greater density. Greater measurements have less uncertainty.
I have no idea
 
jack edison said:
as we are calculating density, if we have a lower volume, we will have greater density. Greater measurements have less uncertainty.
I have no idea
Surely you are trying to measure the density of a given substance. If you have a lower volume the mass will be less. The density won't change.
It might help if you explain exactly what method you use for determining the density.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top