Impulse and maximum height of a particle

AI Thread Summary
A particle experiences an upward impulse from a force described by F = -8t² + 8t over 1 second. The impulse calculated is 4/3, which leads to a final velocity of v = 3m/4, assuming the mass is m. To find the maximum height, the formula h_max = v²/(2g) is used, resulting in h_max = 9m²/(32g). The discussion emphasizes using the impulse-momentum theorem rather than taking the derivative of the force. The final height expression is presented in terms of the particle's mass and gravitational acceleration.
thaalescosta
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle receives an impulse that lasts 1s, coming from a upwards vertical force. This force is given by the following equation: F = -8t²+8t.

What is the maximum height reached by the particle?

Homework Equations



F = -8t²+8t

The Attempt at a Solution



\int(-8t²+8t)dt = (-8t³ +12t²)/3

When t = 1s, I = 4/3. That's what I got as my impulse.

For the maximum height, I took the derivative of F and set it = 0, finding that t = 1/2

Now I don't know how to find the height with all the information I have.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thaalescosta said:

Homework Statement


A particle receives an impulse that lasts 1s, coming from a upwards vertical force. This force is given by the following equation: F = -8t2+8t.

What is the maximum height reached by the particle?


Homework Equations



F = -8t²+8t

The Attempt at a Solution



\int(-8t^2+8t)dt = (-8t^3 +12t^2)/3

When t = 1s, I = 4/3. That's what I got as my impulse.

For the maximum height, I took the derivative of F and set it = 0, finding that t = 1/2

Now I don't know how to find the height with all the information I have.
Hello thaalescosta. Welcome to PF !

(Use ^2 for an eponent of 2 in Latex.)

There's no need to use the derivative of the force, F.

The change in momentum of the particle is equal to the impulse. (Impulse - Momentum Theorem)


Do you know the mass of the particle?
 
SammyS said:
Hello thaalescosta. Welcome to PF !

(Use ^2 for an eponent of 2 in Latex.)

Got it :)

There's no need to use the derivative of the force, F.

The change in momentum of the particle is equal to the impulse. (Impulse - Momentum Theorem)


Do you know the mass of the particle?

So I = ΔP = P_{f} - P_{i} = ∫Fdt, from i to f

My impulse turned out to be 4/3.

The mass of the particle wasn't given. I'm guessing that the answer will be in general terms.

If I = m.v, then v = 3m/4

And if the maximum height is
h_{max} = v²/2g
then
h_{max} = 9m²/32g


Does this make sense?
 
thaalescosta said:
Got it :)



So I = ΔP = P_{f} - P_{i} = ∫Fdt, from i to f

My impulse turned out to be 4/3.

The mass of the particle wasn't given. I'm guessing that the answer will be in general terms.

If I = m.v, then v = 3m/4

And if the maximum height is
h_{max} = v²/2g
then
h_{max} = 9m²/32g

Does this make sense?
Yes.

You probably should enclose the entire denominator in parentheses.

h_{max} = v^2/(2g)

h_{max} = 9m^2/(32g)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top