Impulse for 2 Degree of freedom system

AI Thread Summary
In a 2 degree of freedom system like a double pendulum, calculating the impulse on the lower ball after it collides with a wall involves considering the entire system's center of mass rather than just the lower ball's momentum change. The interaction forces between the two masses and the ceiling complicate the analysis, as they share the impulse transferred from the wall. If the masses are connected by massless rigid links, internal forces cancel out, but the net impulsive force still affects both masses. For accurate calculations, specific parameters such as angles and lengths must be known, especially if assuming a perfectly elastic collision. Ultimately, the change in momentum of both balls must be included to determine the impulsive force on the wall.
supernova1387
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a question which might be simple.

Suppose we have a 2 degree of freedom system such as a double pendulum which is suspended from the ceiling. Now if the second ball (the lower one) collides with the wall, how can we find the impulse exerted on the ball. I mean do we consider the change in linear momentum JUST for the second ball or do we have to find the center of mass of the system and find the velocity change for the center of mass of the system? Recall that principle of linear momentum states that:

mv1 + Ʃ∫ F*dt= mv2
and the impulse I=Ʃ∫ F*dt
:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be a little complicated, because the constraint forces will transfer impulse between the two masses and between top mass and ceiling. So neither of these two will give you correct answer. The net impulse transferred by wall and ceiling is going to be the center of mass velocity change. But you can't say how much is each one responsible for without doing further analysis.
 
Thank you for the reply. What if we assume the 2 mass system are connected together and to the wall by massless rigid links. In that case I think the impulsive forces between the members will be like internal forces and they will cancel each other. Can we say here that the net impulsive force is equal to the change in velocity of the second ball ( the lower one)? Or do we still have to consider the center of mass for the system?
 
The force between the two masses cancels out if you consider CoM motion, of course. The reason I pointed out existence of that interaction is to make sure you don't think that the impulse transferred from the wall goes to the lower mass only. It is shared between the two masses, but so is the impulse from the ceiling. You still can't say anything without going to specific case. If you know angles of both pendulums, lengths of arms, and assume perfectly elastic collision, then you can solve for constraint forces and find out exactly how much momentum was transferred from the wall and the ceiling.
 
supernova1387 said:
Can we say here that the net impulsive force is equal to the change in velocity of the second ball ( the lower one)? Or do we still have to consider the center of mass for the system?

Think about what happens if the rod connecting the two balls is horizontal when the collision occurs. The horizontal component of velocity of both balls is the same, before and after the impulse.

To get the impulsive force on the wall, you have to include the change of momentum of both balls.
 
Thank you both for your answers.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top