Impulse/Momentum ball into wall Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter adorrkable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Wall
AI Thread Summary
A 0.1 kg ball rolling at 0.5 m/s reverses direction upon hitting a wall, resulting in a change in momentum of -0.1 kg m/s. The impulse exerted on the ball by the wall is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the impulse the ball exerts on the wall, confirming Newton's third law. Although the wall's momentum change is negligible, it still reacts to the impact, which is not significant for the problem's calculations. The impulse delivered to the wall is therefore 0.1 kg m/s. The discussion clarifies that the impulse applied to the ball equals its change in momentum, reinforcing the principles of impulse and momentum.
adorrkable
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1) A 0.1 kg ball is rolling across the floor at 0.5 m/s when it hits a wall and reverses direction without any change in speed.

A) Can you determine the impulse delivered to the ball by the wall? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.

B) Can you determine the impulse delivered by the ball to the wall? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.

C) Can you determine the force exerted by the wall on the ball? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.


Homework Equations


Jnet = \Deltap
p = m*v
J = Fnet * \Deltat


The Attempt at a Solution


My problem - I managed to calculate that the change in momentum for the ball is -0.1 m/s, but if this is the amount of impulse it exerts on the wall (since Jnet = Δp), wouldn't the wall exert an equal and opposite impulse? But wouldn't the wall's momentum and therefore change in momentum be zero, because Δp = m * Δv, and the wall never has any velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi adorrkable,

adorrkable said:

Homework Statement


1) A 0.1 kg ball is rolling across the floor at 0.5 m/s when it hits a wall and reverses direction without any change in speed.

A) Can you determine the impulse delivered to the ball by the wall? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.

B) Can you determine the impulse delivered by the ball to the wall? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.

C) Can you determine the force exerted by the wall on the ball? If so, what is it? If not, explain why not.


Homework Equations


Jnet = \Deltap
p = m*v
J = Fnet * \Deltat


The Attempt at a Solution


My problem - I managed to calculate that the change in momentum for the ball is -0.1 m/s

Not to be picky, but remember the units are kg m/s.

, but if this is the amount of impulse it exerts on the wall (since Jnet = Δp),

Actually that's the impulse the wall exerts on the ball. When you apply:

<br /> \mbox{impulse} = \Delta p<br />

the two sides of the equation have to be applied to the same system. But yes, the impulse from the wall on the ball is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction from the impulse of the ball on the wall.

wouldn't the wall exert an equal and opposite impulse? But wouldn't the wall's momentum and therefore change in momentum be zero, because Δp = m * Δv, and the wall never has any velocity.

We wouldn't say that the no part of the wall never has any velocity, it's just that it's small enough to be ignored here. The wall will react in some way to the impact, but it's not important to the problem.
 
So the ball exerts an impulse of -0.1 kg m/s, and the wall exerts an impulse of 0.1 kg m/s, am I correct?

Thank you very much!
 
adorrkable said:
So the ball exerts an impulse of -0.1 kg m/s, and the wall exerts an impulse of 0.1 kg m/s, am I correct?

If the ball's change in momentum is -0.1 kg m/s, then that is what happened to it; and so the impulse of -0.1 kg m/s is what was applied to the ball (and the negative of that is what the ball applied to the wall).

That's what I meant about the equation; if you're looking at the ball as your system, then:

(impulse applied to ball)=(change in ball's momentum)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top