In the beginning there was one force

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainHammer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beginning Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the unification of fundamental forces during the early epochs of the universe, specifically the Planck, GUT, and electroweak epochs. The participant is exploring the implications of this unification, questioning whether gauge bosons were equivalent and how gravity fits into this framework. They suggest that the different forces we observe today may be manifestations of a single, more fundamental force, similar to how electric and magnetic fields relate to electromagnetism. The conversation also touches on the possibility of multiple bosons mediating these forces as they separated. Overall, the inquiry highlights the complexities of understanding the early universe's fundamental forces.
CaptainHammer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, new guy here.

I am currently writing a short essay on the beginning of the universe. I chose not to put this in the Homework section mainly because it does not fit the template, and I think that it's an interesting discussion. More interesting than a simple homework.
My essay will have a strong emphasis on inflation and nucleosynthesis.

But that is not the topic.

I am more interested in the first three epochs. Planck, GUT and electroweak. The question that I bring to you all is, what does it mean that the fundamental forces were unified?

Were the gauge bosons equivalent to one another? If so, what about gravity?
Were the forces mediated by a single kind of boson that "degenerated" as forces separated?
 
Space news on Phys.org
CaptainHammer said:
I am more interested in the first three epochs. Planck, GUT and electroweak. The question that I bring to you all is, what does it mean that the fundamental forces were unified?
There was (probably) one more general, more fundamental force. What we see today are (probably) different aspects of the same force, like electric and magnetic field are different aspects of the more general electromagnetism (imagine we wouldn't see the influences of those fields on each other, then we would treat it as two different forces).

Were the gauge bosons equivalent to one another?
They were different.

If so, what about gravity?
Find the answer and you'll get a Nobel Prize.
Were the forces mediated by a single kind of boson that "degenerated" as forces separated?
Probably more than one boson.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Back
Top