Inclusion-Exclusion Quick Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caldus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine how many elements are in exactly two of four sets, one can apply the principle of inclusion-exclusion. The formula involves calculating the total number of elements in each set, subtracting the intersections of pairs, and adding back intersections of triples, while subtracting the intersection of all four sets. For example, if each set has 28 elements, with specific intersections provided, the cardinality of elements in exactly two sets can be derived by considering the complements of the other sets. The approach requires careful manipulation of set identities and intersections. Ultimately, solving this problem hinges on accurately applying these principles to the specific data provided.
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
If I am given data for four sets and am asked to find how many elements are in exactly two of these four sets, how would I approach the problem?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
inc exc in this case states, if i let the sets be 1,2,3,4 that

|1u2u3u4| = |1|+|2|+|3|+|4| - |1n2|-|1n3|-|1n4|-|2n3|-|2n4|-|3n4|+|1n2n3| +|1n2n4|+|2n3n4|-|1n2n3n4|

how you use that depends on the details of the question. that is assuming that is what you meant by "4 sets", which 4 sets? which two of them do you need to find the cardinality of the interesection of?
 
If Universe = 75 and there for sets A1 - A4,

Each A has 28
Each intersection of two has 12 (Example: A1 n A2 = 12)
Each intersection of three has 5
Intersection of all sets equal 1

How do I go about finding how many elements are in exactly two sets?
 
Let Bi be the complement of Ai, then you want to find the cardinalities of all sets like

A1nA2mB3nB4

oughtn't to be too hard after you've played around with all the set identities you can think of, but to be honest, that I've not done.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top