Increase Genetic Diversity Through Plant Crossing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    diversity
AI Thread Summary
Genetic diversity plays a crucial role in plant resistance to pests and diseases. The discussion centers around two statements: one suggesting that crossing plants with ancestral varieties can enhance genetic resistance, and the other claiming that genetic engineering increases diversity by creating new species with synthetic genes. There is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of ancestral varieties, as pests may adapt to these plants, potentially reducing resistance. The concept of genetic engineering is clarified, noting that while it introduces genes from other organisms, it often results in a lack of genetic diversity within the modified population. The distinction between synthetic genes and those derived from natural sources is emphasized, with a consensus leaning towards the idea that artificial selection, rather than synthetic gene creation, is more common in developing new plant varieties. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of genetic diversity, resistance, and the implications of genetic engineering in agriculture.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
Which is a true statement about genetic diversity?

a. Genetic resistance to pests and diseases can be increased by crossing a plant with ancestral varieties
b. Genetic engineering technology is used to increase genetic diversity by creating new species with synthetic genes

I want to say B, but I am uncertain because of the "synthetic" part. For A, wouldn't genetic resistance decrease if ancestral varieties are involved? I mean, aren't the pests and bacteria already familiar with the ancestor plants?

Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It is hard to say. Is there more context to the question?

The ancestral plants might have resistance to some pest because the pest has adapted to non-resistant plant or to a new resistance. Therefore the resistance might be lost. As far as genetic diversity, it is probably all the same genes in the gene pool but there will be different version of these genes. Therefore new variety will be created.

For the GMO, it is a gene from another organism that is introduce into the organism of choice. The population of plant will be in general a clone of the first isolated plant carrying the desired gene. Also, these plants tend to be infertile but it has been proven otherwise in some cases. So, there will be little genetic diversity within a group.

I would go for A
 
It's A. We don't create synthetic genes. Humans may use artificial selection to choose desirable genes to make better combinations of animals and plants, sometimes creating whole new species, but these are definitely not synthetic genes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We create synthetic genes. Any genes that would be found in nature and is create in the lab. Fusing genes creates a synthetic gene.

We have plasmid that are entirely synthethic.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top